Cited by 61Research, Science, and AcademiaInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationScience and Science Education

Constructing a Broader and More Inclusive Value System in Science

Uriarte, María, Ewing, Holly A., Eviner, Valerie T., Weathers, Kathleen C.·2007·BioScience

Abstract

A scientific culture that welcomes a diversity of participants and addresses a broad range of questions is critical to the success of the scientific enterprise and essential for engaging the public in science. By favoring behaviors and practices that result in a narrow set of outcomes, our current scientific culture may lower the diversity of the scientific workforce, limit the range and relevance of scientific pursuits, and restrict the scope of interdisciplinary collaboration and public engagement. The scientific community will reach its full intellectual potential and secure public support through thorough, multitiered initiatives that aim to change individual and institutional behaviors, shift current reward structures to reflect a wider set of values, and explicitly consider societal benefits in the establishment of research agendas. We discuss some shortcomings and costs of the current value system and provide some guidelines for the development of initiatives that transcend such limitations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1641/b570111

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uriarte, M., Ewing, H. A., Eviner, V. T., & Weathers, K. C.
Affiliations
  • Bates College (US)
  • Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
Venue
BioScience
Published
2007-01-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
71-78
ISSN
  • 0006-3568 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3244
OpenAlex
W1987220420
Cited by
61
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BioScience (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
Keywords
scientific culture, diversity in science, research evaluation, reward structure, public engagement with science, interdisciplinary collaboration, social impact of research, research agenda setting, institutional change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review