Cited by 63Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyFossil Insects in AmberBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms

Structure and function of hindlimb feathers in Archaeopteryx lithographica

Longrich, Nick·2006·Paleobiology

Abstract

This study examines the morphology and function of hindlimb plumage in Archaeopteryx lithographica . Feathers cover the legs of the Berlin specimen, extending from the cranial surface of the tibia and the caudal margins of both tibia and femur. These feathers exhibit features of flight feathers rather than contour feathers, including vane asymmetry, curved shafts, and a self-stabilizing overlap pattern. Many of these features facilitate lift generation in the wings and tail of birds, suggesting that the hindlimbs acted as airfoils. A new reconstruction of Archaeopteryx is presented, in which the hindlimbs form approximately 12% of total airfoil area. Depending upon their orientation, the hindlimbs could have reduced stall speed by up to 6% and turning radius by up to 12%. Presence of the “four-winged” planform in both Archaeopteryx and basal Dromaeosauridae indicates that their common ancestor used fore- and hindlimbs to generate lift. This finding suggests that arboreal parachuting and gliding preceded the evolution of avian flight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1666/04014.1

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A putative aerodynamic control function for the long, stiff, frond-feathered tail and hindlimb plumage argues for an alternative aerial posture compared to modern birds.

    “A putative aerodynamic control function for the long, stiff, frond-feathered tail2 and hindlimb plumage31 argue for an alternative aerial posture compared to modern birds.”

    From Wing bone geometry reveals active flight in Archaeopteryx (2018) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longrich, N.
Venue
Paleobiology
Published
2006
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
417-431
ISSN
  • 0094-8373 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5331
OpenAlex
W2145733612
Cited by
63
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Paleobiology (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Keywords
Archaeopteryx lithographica, flight feathers, feather morphology, airfoil, lift generation, stall speed, turning radius, Dromaeosauridae, gliding, avian flight evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review