Cited by 31Radiation Dose and ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

Dose Estimation for the European Epidemiological Study on Pediatric Computed Tomography (EPI-CT)

Open access
Thierry-Chef, Isabelle, Ferro, Gilles, Le Cornet, Lucian, Dabin, Jérémie, Istad, Tore S., Jahnen, Andreas, Lee, Choonsik, Maccia, Carlo +16 more·2021·Radiation Research

Abstract

Within the European Epidemiological Study to Quantify Risks for Paediatric Computerized Tomography (EPI-CT study), a cohort was assembled comprising nearly one million children, adolescents and young adults who received over 1.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations before 22 years of age in nine European countries from the late 1970s to 2014. Here we describe the methods used for, and the results of, organ dose estimations from CT scanning for the EPI-CT cohort members. Data on CT machine settings were obtained from national surveys, questionnaire data, and the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) headers of 437,249 individual CT scans. Exposure characteristics were reconstructed for patients within specific age groups who received scans of the same body region, based on categories of machines with common technology used over the time period in each of the 276 participating hospitals. A carefully designed method for assessing uncertainty combined with the National Cancer Institute Dosimetry System for CT (NCICT, a CT organ dose calculator), was employed to estimate absorbed dose to individual organs for each CT scan received. The two-dimensional Monte Carlo sampling method, which maintains a separation of shared and unshared error, allowed us to characterize uncertainty both on individual doses as well as for the entire cohort dose distribution. Provided here are summaries of estimated doses from CT imaging per scan and per examination, as well as the overall distribution of estimated doses in the cohort. Doses are provided for five selected tissues (active bone marrow, brain, eye lens, thyroid and female breasts), by body region (i.e., head, chest, abdomen/pelvis), patient age, and time period (1977-1990, 1991-2000, 2001-2014). Relatively high doses were received by the brain from head CTs in the early 1990s, with individual mean doses (mean of 200 simulated values) of up to 66 mGy per scan. Optimization strategies implemented since the late 1990s have resulted in an overall decrease in doses over time, especially at young ages. In chest CTs, active bone marrow doses dropped from over 15 mGy prior to 1991 to approximately 5 mGy per scan after 2001. Our findings illustrate patterns of age-specific doses and their temporal changes, and provide suitable dose estimates for radiation-induced risk estimation in epidemiological studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rade-20-00231.1

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainties in individual doses are not negligible (geometric s.d. of the order of 2 on average), particularly in early years, and could not be fully integrated in the risk analyses.

    “While the EPI-CT dose reconstruction is based on sophisticated modeling of doses and associated shared and unshared uncertainties, uncertainties in individual doses are not negligible (geometric s.d. of the order of 2 on average7), particularly in early years, and could not be fully integrated in the risk analyses.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thierry-Chef, I., Ferro, G., Le Cornet, L., Dabin, J., Istad, T. S., Jahnen, A., Lee, C., Maccia, C., Malchair, F., Olerud, H. M., Harbron, R. W., Figuerola, J., Hermen, J., Moissonnier, M., Bernier, M.-O., de Basea, M. B., Byrnes, G., Cardis, E., Hauptmann, M., Journy, N., Kesminiene, A., Meulepas, J. M., Pokora, R., & Simon, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
  • Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (BE)
  • Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (NO)
  • Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
  • Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics (US)
  • CAATS, Sèvres, France
  • University of South-Eastern Norway (NO)
  • Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU)
  • Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (FR)
  • Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain
  • The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Thierry-Chef, Isabelle
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2021-04-28
Volume
196
Issue
1
Pages
74-99
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W3157149673
Cited by
31
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit
  • Cancer Research UK (C22891/A16015)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (RRX119)
  • Newcastle University
  • Public Health England
  • Helse Nord-Trøndelag
  • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
pediatric computed tomography, organ dose estimation, DICOM header, Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis, head CT, chest CT, brain dose, lens dose, thyroid dose, breast dose, radiation-induced cancer risk, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Europe, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Radiation Dosage, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cohort Studies, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review