Cited by 113Effects of Radiation ExposureRadiation Dose and ImagingGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Incidence of breast cancer in the life span study of atomic bomb survivors: 1958-2009

Open access
Brenner, Alina V., Preston, Dale L., Sakata, Ritsu, Sugiyama, Hiromi, de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington, French, Benjamin, Utada, Mai, Cahoon, Elizabeth K. +4 more·2018·Radiation Research

Abstract

The importance of reproductive history in breast tissue development and etiology of sporadic breast cancer in females is well established. However, there is limited evidence of factors, other than age, that modify risk of radiation-related breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated breast cancer incidence in the Life Span Study cohort of atomic bomb survivors, adding 11 years of follow-up and incorporating reproductive history data. We used Poisson regression models to describe radiation risks and modifying effects of age and reproductive factors. Among 62,534 females, we identified 1,470 breast cancers between 1958 and 2009. Of 397 new cases diagnosed since 1998, 75% were exposed before age 20. We found a strong linear dose response with excess relative risk (ERR) of 1.12 per Gy [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73 to 1.59] for females at age 70 after exposure at age 30. The ERR decreased with increasing attained age ( P = 0.007) while excess absolute rate (EAR) increased with attained age up to age 70 ( P < 0.001). Age at menarche was a strong modifier of the radiation effect: for a given dose, both the ERR and EAR decreased with increasing age at menarche ( P = 0.007 and P < 0.001). Also, independently, age-at-exposure effects on ERR and EAR differed before and after menarche ( P = 0.043 and P = 0.015, respectively, relative to log-linear trends), with highest risks for exposures around menarche. Despite the small number of male breast cancers (n = 10), the data continue to suggest a dose response (ERR per Gy = 5.7; 95% CI: 0.3 to 30.8; P = 0.018). Persistently increased risk of female breast cancer after radiation exposure and its modification pattern suggests heightened breast sensitivity during puberty.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/rr15015.1

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The INWORKS study is only 9% female while the LSS is 60% female and has doses more distributed near 600 mSv.

    “The INWORKS study is only 9% female while the LSS is 60% female and doses more distributed near 600 mSv”

    From A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection (2021) · cites this paper as Brenner et al., 2018

    Table 1 (page unavailable) reports 62,534 females and 42,910 males in the LSS cohort, making it approximately 59% female. It also lists dose categories extending through 0.5 Gy and above, but most participants are in lower-dose categories; it does not establish that doses were concentrated near 600 mSv. The paper does not substantiate the claim that INWORKS was 9% female or compare its dose distribution with the LSS. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]26. Cullings HM, Grant EJ, Egbert SD, Watanabe T, Oda T, Nakamura F, et al. DS02R1: Improvements to atomic bomb survivors' input data and implementation of Dosimetry System 2002 (DS02) and resulting changes in estimated doses. Health Phys 2017; 112:56-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brenner, A. V., Preston, D. L., Sakata, R., Sugiyama, H., de Gonzalez, A. B., French, B., Utada, M., Cahoon, E. K., Sadakane, A., Ozasa, K., Grant, E. J., & Mabuchi, K.
Affiliations
  • Radiation Effects Research Foundation (JP)
  • Hirosoft International, Eureka, California
  • Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Brenner, Alina V.
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2018-07-25
Volume
190
Issue
4
Pages
433
ISSN
0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883283279
Cited by
113
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DEHS0000031)
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (DE-HS0000031)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (ZIACP010134, HHSN261201400009C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
breast cancer incidence, atomic bomb survivors, Life Span Study, radiation-induced cancer, reproductive history, age at menarche, age at exposure, dose-response relationship, excess relative risk, excess absolute risk, male breast cancer, puberty
MeSH terms
Radiation Exposure, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Japan, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Incidence, Survivors, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Nuclear Weapons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review