Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

STEROID AND PHYTO-OESTROGEN BINDING TO SHEEP UTERINE RECEPTORS IN VITRO

SHUTT, D. A., COX, R. I.·1972·Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

SUMMARY: The binding affinities and receptor specificity of sheep uterine cytosol for steroid oestrogens and also for weak plant oestrogens of the isoflavone and coumestan groups and some synthetic compounds were studied. The binding affinities of the weak oestrogens fall within a range which has usually been neglected. Relative molar binding (RMB) affinities for the steroid oestrogens confirmed the importance of the phenolic 3-hydroxyl group and the influence of substitutions at C-16 and C-17, as seen with uterine cytosols from other species. Relative molar binding affinities were very much lower when the oestrogens were present as sulphate esters, glucosiduronate and methyl ether derivatives; acetates showed similar RMB affinities to their parent compounds. Phyto-oestrogens were found to compete with oestradiol for binding sites. Coumestrol and miroestrol had the highest RMB affinities of about 5 (oestradiol-17β = 100) when incubated at 25 °C, and values for genistein, equol, daidzein and O-desmethylangolensin lay between 1 and 0·05. The mono-methoxy compounds, biochanin A, formononetin and 4′-methoxy-coumestrol had RMB affinities of less than 0·01. Incubation at 37, 25 and 4 °C showed that RMB affinities were greater at the lower temperatures. Relative molar binding affinities of the phyto-oestrogens in vitro compared with their oestrogenic potencies in vivo showed that the ranking of most of the compounds by these two criteria was similar. Structure-activity correlations were deduced from the results. A similar relationship of RMB affinity to biological potency was also noted for the steroid oestrogens and a homologous series of stilbenediols. The results obtained are relevant to competitive protein-binding analyses and to the mechanism of action of oestrogens and phyto-oestrogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1677/joe.0.0520299

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Authors
SHUTT, D. A., & COX, R. I.
Venue
Journal of Endocrinology
Published
1972-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
299-310
ISSN
  • 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-6805
OpenAlex
W2021892056
Cited by
388
References
0
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STEROID AND PHYTO-OESTROGEN BINDING TO SHEEP UTERINE RECEPTORS IN VITRO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1677/joe.0.0520299
The paper
SHUTT, D. A., & COX, R. I. (1972). STEROID AND PHYTO-OESTROGEN BINDING TO SHEEP UTERINE RECEPTORS IN VITRO. Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0520299

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.