The DOI matches its Crossref record.
STEROID AND PHYTO-OESTROGEN BINDING TO SHEEP UTERINE RECEPTORS IN VITRO
Abstract
SUMMARY: The binding affinities and receptor specificity of sheep uterine cytosol for steroid oestrogens and also for weak plant oestrogens of the isoflavone and coumestan groups and some synthetic compounds were studied. The binding affinities of the weak oestrogens fall within a range which has usually been neglected. Relative molar binding (RMB) affinities for the steroid oestrogens confirmed the importance of the phenolic 3-hydroxyl group and the influence of substitutions at C-16 and C-17, as seen with uterine cytosols from other species. Relative molar binding affinities were very much lower when the oestrogens were present as sulphate esters, glucosiduronate and methyl ether derivatives; acetates showed similar RMB affinities to their parent compounds. Phyto-oestrogens were found to compete with oestradiol for binding sites. Coumestrol and miroestrol had the highest RMB affinities of about 5 (oestradiol-17β = 100) when incubated at 25 °C, and values for genistein, equol, daidzein and O-desmethylangolensin lay between 1 and 0·05. The mono-methoxy compounds, biochanin A, formononetin and 4′-methoxy-coumestrol had RMB affinities of less than 0·01. Incubation at 37, 25 and 4 °C showed that RMB affinities were greater at the lower temperatures. Relative molar binding affinities of the phyto-oestrogens in vitro compared with their oestrogenic potencies in vivo showed that the ranking of most of the compounds by these two criteria was similar. Structure-activity correlations were deduced from the results. A similar relationship of RMB affinity to biological potency was also noted for the steroid oestrogens and a homologous series of stilbenediols. The results obtained are relevant to competitive protein-binding analyses and to the mechanism of action of oestrogens and phyto-oestrogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability
Manach, C., Scalbert, A., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., & Jiménez, L. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727 · Cited by 8,175
Interaction between Phenolics and Gut Microbiota: Role in Human Health
Selma, M. V., Espín, J. C., & Tomás-Barberán, F. A. (2009) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf902107d · Cited by 1,324
Soy intake and cancer risk: A review of the in vitro and in vivo data
Messina, M. J., Persky, V., Setchell, K. D. R., & Barnes, S. (1994) · Nutrition and Cancer · doi:10.1080/01635589409514310 · Cited by 1,315
Phytoestrogen Interaction with Estrogen Receptors in Human Breast Cancer Cells
MARTIN, P. M., HORWITZ, K. B., RYAN, D. S., & McGUIRE, W. L. (1978) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo-103-5-1860 · Cited by 601
Equol: History, Chemistry, and Formation
Setchell, K. D. R., & Clerici, C. (2010) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.3945/jn.109.119776 · Cited by 519
Metadata
- Authors
- SHUTT, D. A., & COX, R. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Bioscientifica
- Published
- 1972-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 299-310
- ISSN
- 0022-0795 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-6805
- OpenAlex
- W2021892056
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: STEROID AND PHYTO-OESTROGEN BINDING TO SHEEP UTERINE RECEPTORS IN VITRO. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1677/joe.0.0520299
- The paper
- SHUTT, D. A., & COX, R. I. (1972). STEROID AND PHYTO-OESTROGEN BINDING TO SHEEP UTERINE RECEPTORS IN VITRO. Journal of Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.0520299
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.