The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment
Abstract
Risk analysis provides a rational basis for flood management decision-making at a national scale, as well as regionally and locally. National-scale flood risk assessment can provide consistent information to support the development of flood management policy, allocation of resources and monitoring of the performance of flood mitigation activities. However, national-scale risk assessment presents particular challenges in terms of data acquisition and manipulation, numerical computation and presentation of results. A methodology that addresses these difficulties through appropriate approximations has been developed and applied in England and Wales. The methodology represents the processes of fluvial and coastal flooding over linear flood defence systems in sufficient detail to test alternative policy options for investment in flood management. Flood outlines and depths are generated, in the absence of a consistent national topographic and water level data set, using a rapid parametric inundation routine. Potential economic and social impacts of flooding are assessed using national databases of flood-plain properties and demography. A case study of the river Parrett catchment and adjoining sea defences in Bridgwater Bay in England demonstrates the application of the method and presentation of results in a geographical information system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis
Teng, J., Jakeman, A. J., Vaze, J., Croke, B. F. W., Dutta, D., & Kim, S. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 · Cited by 1,456
Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?
Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., & Thieken, A. H. (2009) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8 · Cited by 586
An agent-based model for risk-based flood incident management
Dawson, R. J., Peppe, R., & Wang, M. (2011) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-011-9745-4 · Cited by 334
Self-citationBüchele, B., Kreibich, H., Kron, A., Thieken, A., Ihringer, J., Oberle, P., Merz, B., & Nestmann, F. (2006) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-6-485-2006 · Cited by 317
Strategic flood management: ten ‘golden rules’ to guide a sound approach
Sayers, P., Galloway, G., Penning-Rowsell, E., Yuanyuan, L., Fuxin, S., Yiwei, C., Kang, W., Le Quesne, T., Wang, L., & Guan, Y. (2015) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2014.902378 · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, J. W., Dawson, R. J., Sayers, P. B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J. B., & Deakin, R.
- Venue
- Maritime Engineering
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-247
- ISSN
- 1741-7597 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102278187
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1680/maen.156.3.235.37976
- The paper
- Hall, J. W., Dawson, R. J., Sayers, P. B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J. B., & Deakin, R. (2003). A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment. Maritime Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1680/maen.156.3.235.37976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.