The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Currently, a shift from classical flood protection as engineering task towards integrated flood risk management concepts can be observed. In this context, a more consequent consideration of extreme events which exceed the design event of flood protection structures and failure scenarios such as dike breaches have to be investigated. Therefore, this study aims to enhance existing methods for hazard and risk assessment for extreme events and is divided into three parts. In the first part, a regionalization approach for flood peak discharges was further developed and substantiated, especially regarding recurrence intervals of 200 to 10 000 years and a large number of small ungauged catchments. Model comparisons show that more confidence in such flood estimates for ungauged areas and very long recurrence intervals may be given as implied by statistical analysis alone. The hydraulic simulation in the second part is oriented towards hazard mapping and risk analyses covering the whole spectrum of relevant flood events. As the hydrodynamic simulation is directly coupled with a GIS, the results can be easily processed as local inundation depths for spatial risk analyses. For this, a new GIS-based software tool was developed, being presented in the third part, which enables estimations of the direct flood damage to single buildings or areas based on different established stage-damage functions. Furthermore, a new multifactorial approach for damage estimation is presented, aiming at the improvement of damage estimation on local scale by considering factors like building quality, contamination and precautionary measures. The methods and results from this study form the base for comprehensive risk analyses and flood management strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States
Mileti, D. S. (1999) · Cited by 2,072
A mathematical model for flood loss estimation
Dutta, D., Herath, S., & Musiake, K. (2003) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00084-2 · Cited by 544
Flood risk assessment and associated uncertainty
Apel, H., Thieken, A. H., Merz, B., & Blöschl, G. (2004) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-4-295-2004 · Cited by 536
Self-citationKreibich, H., Thieken, A. H., Petrow, T., Müller, M., & Merz, B. (2005) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-5-117-2005 · Cited by 448
Self-citationEstimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Thieken, A., & Schmidtke, R. (2004) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-4-153-2004 · Cited by 444
Self-citationFlood damage estimation - A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions
Smith, D. I. (1994) · Water SA · Cited by 343
A methodology for national-scale flood risk assessment
Hall, J. W., Dawson, R. J., Sayers, P. B., Rosu, C., Chatterton, J. B., & Deakin, R. (2003) · Maritime Engineering · doi:10.1680/maen.156.3.235.37976 · Cited by 201
Comparative Risk Assessments for the City of Cologne – Storms, Floods, Earthquakes
Grünthal, G., Thieken, A. H., Schwarz, J., Radtke, K. S., Smolka, A., & Merz, B. (2006) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-005-8598-0 · Cited by 184
Self-citationUrban Flood Protection Benefits: A Project Appraisal Guide
Parker, D. J., Green, C. H., & Thompson, P. M. (1987) · Cited by 137
The handbook of water economics: principles and practice
Green, C. H. (2003) · Thammasat University Digital Collections · Cited by 65
Cited by
Review article "Assessment of economic flood damage"
Merz, B., Kreibich, H., Schwarze, R., & Thieken, A. (2010) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-10-1697-2010 · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationA Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior
Bubeck, P., Botzen, W. J. W., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2012) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x · Cited by 1,201
Fernández, D. S., & Lutz, M. A. (2010) · Engineering Geology · doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.12.006 · Cited by 591
Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?
Apel, H., Aronica, G. T., Kreibich, H., & Thieken, A. H. (2009) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8 · Cited by 586
Self-citationFlood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use
de Moel, H., van Alphen, J., & Aerts, J. C. J. H. (2009) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-9-289-2009 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Büchele, B., Kreibich, H., Kron, A., Thieken, A., Ihringer, J., Oberle, P., Merz, B., & Nestmann, F.
- Venue
- Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2006-06-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485-503
- ISSN
- 1561-8633 (ISSN-L)
- 1684-9981
- OpenAlex
- W2118084513
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/nhess-6-485-2006
- The paper
- Büchele, B., Kreibich, H., Kron, A., Thieken, A., Ihringer, J., Oberle, P., Merz, B., & Nestmann, F. (2006). Flood-risk mapping: contributions towards an enhanced assessment of extreme events and associated risks. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-485-2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.