The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Clinical Score to Predict Acute Renal Failure after Cardiac Surgery
Abstract
The risk of mortality associated with acute renal failure (ARF) after open-heart surgery continues to be distressingly high. Accurate prediction of ARF provides an opportunity to develop strategies for early diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical score to predict postoperative ARF by incorporating the effect of all of its major risk factors. A total of 33,217 patients underwent open-heart surgery at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation (1993 to 2002). The primary outcome was ARF that required dialysis. The scoring model was developed in a randomly selected test set (n = 15,838) and was validated on the remaining patients. Its predictive accuracy was compared by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The score ranges between 0 and 17 points. The ARF frequency at each score level in the validation set fell within the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the corresponding frequency in the test set. Four risk categories of increasing severity (scores 0 to 2, 3 to 5, 6 to 8, and 9 to 13) were formed arbitrarily. The frequency of ARF across these categories in the test set ranged between 0.5 and 22.1%. The score was also valid in predicting ARF across all risk categories. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the score in the test set was 0.81 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.83) and was similar to that in the validation set (0.82; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.85; P = 0.39). In conclusion, a score is valid and accurate in predicting ARF after open-heart surgery; along with increasing its clinical utility, the score can help in planning future clinical trials of ARF.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mishra, J., Dent, C., Tarabishi, R., Mitsnefes, M. M., Ma, Q., Kelly, C., Ruff, S. M., Zahedi, K., Shao, M., Bean, J., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)74811-x · Cited by 2,394
Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury
Hoste, E. A. J., Kellum, J. A., Selby, N. M., Zarbock, A., Palevsky, P. M., Bagshaw, S. M., Goldstein, S. L., Cerdá, J., & Chawla, L. S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0 · Cited by 1,486
Acute kidney injury-epidemiology, outcomes and economics
Rewa, O., & Bagshaw, S. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2013.282 · Cited by 734
Dent, C. L., Ma, Q., Dastrala, S., Bennett, M., Mitsnefes, M. M., Barasch, J., & Devarajan, P. (2007) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc6192 · Cited by 483
The development of a machine learning inpatient acute kidney injury prediction model.
Koyner, J. L., Carey, K. A., Edelson, D. P., & Churpek, M. M. (2018) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000003123 · Cited by 323
. Prediction, progression and outcomes of chronic kidney disease in older adults.
Anderson, S., Halter, J. B., Hazzard, W. R., Himmelfarb, J., Horne, F. M., Kaysen, G. A., Kusek, J. W., Nayfield, S. G., Schmader, K., Tian, Y., et al. (2009) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2008080860 · Cited by 218
Sutherland, S. M., Chawla, L. S., Kane-Gill, S. L., Hsu, R. K., Kramer, A. A., Goldstein, S. L., Kellum, J. A., Ronco, C., Bagshaw, S. M., & on behalf of the 15 ADQI Consensus Group (2016) · Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease · doi:10.1186/s40697-016-0099-4 · Cited by 115
Wang, Y., & Li, Q. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-97269-9 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Thakar, C. V., Arrigain, S., Worley, S., Yared, J.-P., & Paganini, E. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 162-168
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141413316
- Cited by
- 1,067
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.