Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

IL-18 and Urinary NGAL Predict Dialysis and Graft Recovery after Kidney Transplantation

Open access
Hall, Isaac E., Yarlagadda, Sri G., Coca, Steven G., Wang, Zhu, Doshi, Mona, Devarajan, Prasad, Han, Won K., Marcus, Richard J., Parikh, Chirag R.·2010·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Current methods for predicting graft recovery after kidney transplantation are not reliable. We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of deceased-donor kidney transplant patients to evaluate urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), IL-18, and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) as biomarkers for predicting dialysis within 1 wk of transplant and subsequent graft recovery. We collected serial urine samples for 3 d after transplant and analyzed levels of these putative biomarkers. We classified graft recovery as delayed graft function (DGF), slow graft function (SGF), or immediate graft function (IGF). Of the 91 patients in the cohort, 34 had DGF, 33 had SGF, and 24 had IGF. Median NGAL and IL-18 levels, but not KIM-1 levels, were statistically different among these three groups at all time points. ROC curve analysis suggested that the abilities of NGAL or IL-18 to predict dialysis within 1 wk were moderately accurate when measured on the first postoperative day, whereas the fall in serum creatinine (Scr) was not predictive. In multivariate analysis, elevated levels of NGAL or IL-18 predicted the need for dialysis after adjusting for recipient and donor age, cold ischemia time, urine output, and Scr. NGAL and IL-18 quantiles also predicted graft recovery up to 3 mo later. In summary, urinary NGAL and IL-18 are early, noninvasive, accurate predictors of both the need for dialysis within the first week of kidney transplantation and 3-mo recovery of graft function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2009030264

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Hall, I. E., Yarlagadda, S. G., Coca, S. G., Wang, Z., Doshi, M., Devarajan, P., Han, W. K., Marcus, R. J., & Parikh, C. R.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2010-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
189-197
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170433159
Cited by
340
References
41
FWCI
19.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IL-18 and Urinary NGAL Predict Dialysis and Graft Recovery after Kidney Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2009030264
The paper
Hall, I. E., Yarlagadda, S. G., Coca, S. G., Wang, Z., Doshi, M., Devarajan, P., Han, W. K., Marcus, R. J., & Parikh, C. R. (2010). IL-18 and Urinary NGAL Predict Dialysis and Graft Recovery after Kidney Transplantation. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2009030264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.