The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockade of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling by Paricalcitol Ameliorates Proteinuria and Kidney Injury
Open accessAbstract
Recent studies implicate Wnt/β-catenin signaling in podocyte dysfunction. Because vitamin D analogs can inhibit β-catenin in other tissues, we tested whether the vitamin D analog paricalcitol could ameliorate podocyte injury, proteinuria, and renal fibrosis in adriamycin (ADR) nephropathy. Compared with vehicle-treated controls, paricalcitol preserved expression of nephrin, podocin, and WT1; prevented proteinuria; and reduced glomerulosclerotic lesions induced by ADR. Paricalcitol also inhibited expression of proinflammatory cytokines, reduced renal infiltration of monocytes/macrophages, hampered activation of renal myofibroblasts, and suppressed expression of the fibrogenic TGF-β1, CTGF, fibronectin, and types I and III collagen. Selective suppression of renal Wnt4, Wnt7a, Wnt7b, and Wnt10a expression after ADR accompanied these renoprotective effects of paricalcitol. Significant upregulation of β-catenin, predominantly in podocytes and tubular epithelial cells, accompanied renal injury; paricalcitol largely abolished this induction of renal β-catenin and inhibited renal expression of Snail, a downstream effector of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Administration of paricalcitol also ameliorated established proteinuria. In vitro, paricalcitol induced a physical interaction between the vitamin D receptor and β-catenin in podocytes, which led to suppression of β-catenin-mediated gene transcription. In summary, these findings suggest that paricalcitol prevents podocyte dysfunction, proteinuria, and kidney injury in adriamycin nephropathy by inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WNT and β-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies
Moon, R. T., Kohn, A. D., Ferrari, G. V. D., & Kaykas, A. (2004) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1427 · Cited by 1,763
Zhou, B. P., Deng, J., Xia, W., Xu, J., Li, Y. M., Gunduz, M., & Hung, M.-C. (2004) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1173 · Cited by 1,581
Cited by
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of renal fibrosis
Liu, Y. (2011) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2011.149 · Cited by 1,446
Self-citationRenal Aging: Causes and Consequences
O’Sullivan, E. D., Hughes, J., & Ferenbach, D. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2015121308 · Cited by 484
Understanding fibrosis in systemic sclerosis: shifting paradigms, emerging opportunities
Bhattacharyya, S., Wei, J., & Varga, J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2011.149 · Cited by 381
Wnt/β-catenin signaling and kidney fibrosis
Tan, R. J., Zhou, D., Zhou, L., & Liu, Y. (2014) · Kidney International Supplements · doi:10.1038/kisup.2014.16 · Cited by 278
Self-citationWei, J., Fang, F., Lam, A. P., Sargent, J. L., Hamburg, E., Hinchcliff, M. E., Gottardi, C. J., Atit, R., Whitfield, M. L., & Varga, J. (2012) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.34424 · Cited by 226
Metadata
- Authors
- He, W., Kang, Y. S., Dai, C., & Liu, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-103
- ISSN
- 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105663114
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockade of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling by Paricalcitol Ameliorates Proteinuria and Kidney Injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.2009121236
- The paper
- He, W., Kang, Y. S., Dai, C., & Liu, Y. (2011). Blockade of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling by Paricalcitol Ameliorates Proteinuria and Kidney Injury. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.2009121236
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.