Cited by 353Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment

Projecting ESRD incidence and prevalence in the United States through 2030

Open access
McCullough, Keith P., Morgenstern, Hal, Saran, Rajiv, Herman, William H., Robinson, Bruce M.·2019·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Background: Population rates of obesity, hypertension, diabetes, age, and race can be used in simulation models to develop projections of ESRD incidence and prevalence. Such projections can inform long-range planning for ESRD resources needs. Methods: We used an open compartmental simulation model to estimate the incidence and prevalence of ESRD in the United States through 2030 on the basis of wide-ranging projections of population obesity and ESRD death rates. Population trends in age, race, hypertension, and diabetes were on the basis of data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the US Census. Results: The increase in ESRD incidence rates within age and race groups has leveled off and/or declined in recent years, but our model indicates that population changes in age and race distribution, obesity and diabetes prevalence, and ESRD survival will result in a 11%–18% increase in the crude incidence rate from 2015 to 2030. This incidence trend along with reductions in ESRD mortality will increase the number of patients with ESRD by 29%–68% during the same period to between 971,000 and 1,259,000 in 2030. Conclusions: The burden of ESRD will increase in the United States population through 2030 due to demographic, clinical, and lifestyle shifts in the population and improvements in RRT. Planning for ESRD resource allocation should allow for substantial continued growth in the population of patients with ESRD. Future interventions should be directed to preventing the progression of CKD to kidney failure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.2018050531

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease are projected to rise and disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority populations in the US.

    “cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease are projected to rise and disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority populations in the US.30,31”

    From Race and ethnicity and pharmacy dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion (page not provided) projects increasing US ESRD incidence and prevalence through 2030 and says growth in the nonwhite population contributes to that trend. The paper does not project cardiovascular disease or CKD overall, and the cited passages do not establish that the projected increase will disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority populations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]United States Renal Data System : Medicare expenditures for persons with ESRD. In: 2017 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2017. Available at: http://www.usrds.org. Accessed February 8, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]United States Renal Data System : Medicare expenditures for persons with ESRD. In: 2015 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2015. Available at: http://www.usrds.org. Accessed February 8, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  3. [3]United States Renal Data System : Incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, and treatment modalities. In: 2015 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2015. Available at: http://www.usrds.org. Accessed February 8, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  4. [5]Nelder JA, Mead R: A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J 7: 308–313, 1965 [Google Scholar]
  5. [11]Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Ogden CL: Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA 319: 1723–1725, 2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [14]United States Renal Data System: Mortality. In: 2017 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2017. Available at: http://www.usrds.org. Accessed February 8, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  7. [15]Møller B, Fekjaer H, Hakulinen T, Sigvaldason H, Storm HH, Talbäck M, et al.: Prediction of cancer incidence in the Nordic countries: Empirical comparison of different approaches. Stat Med 22: 2751–2766, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. [16]Port FK: End-stage renal disease: Magnitude of the problem, prognosis of future trends and possible solutions. Kidney Int Suppl 50[Suppl]: S3–S6, 1995 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. [17]Xue JL, Ma JZ, Louis TA, Collins AJ: Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2010. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2753–2758, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. [18]Gilbertson DT, Liu J, Xue JL, Louis TA, Solid CA, Ebben JP, et al.: Projecting the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2015. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 3736–3741, 2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. [19]United States Renal Data System: Incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, and treatment modalities. In: 2016 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2016. Available at: http://www.usrds.org. Accessed February 8, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  12. [20]United States Renal Data System: Incidence, prevalence, patient characteristics, and treatment modalities. In: 2017 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States, Bethesda, MD, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2017. Available at: http://www.usrds.org. Accessed February 8, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  13. [21]Wakasugi M, Kazama JJ, Narita I: Anticipated increase in the number of patients who require dialysis treatment among the aging population of Japan. Ther Apher Dial 19: 201–206, 2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. [22]McFarlane PA, Pierratos A, Redelmeier DA: Cost savings of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis. Kidney Int 62: 2216–2222, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. [23]Sinnakirouchenan R, Holley JL: Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: Risks, benefits, and access issues. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 18: 428–432, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. [24]Genovese G, Friedman DJ, Ross MD, Lecordier L, Uzureau P, Freedman BI, et al. : Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans. Science 329: 841–845, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. [25]Pecoits-Filho R, Perkovic V: Are SGLT2 inhibitors ready for prime time for CKD? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 318–320, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. [26]Held PJ, McCormick F, Ojo A, Roberts JP: A cost-benefit analysis of government compensation of kidney donors. Am J Transplant 16: 877–885, 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. [27]Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LYC, et al.: Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341: 1725–1730, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. [28]Melanson TA, Hockenberry JM, Plantinga L, Basu M, Pastan S, Mohan S, et al.: New kidney allocation system associated with increased rates of transplants among black and Hispanic patients. Health Aff (Millwood) 36: 1078–1085, 2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. [31]Noble HR, Agus A, Brazil K, Burns A, Goodfellow NA, Guiney M, et al.: PAlliative Care in chronic Kidney diSease: The PACKS study--quality of life, decision making, costs and impact on carers in people managed without dialysis. BMC Nephrol 16: 104, 2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. [32]Ljungvalla Å, Zimmerman FJ.: Bigger bodies: long-term trends and disparities in obesity and body-mass index among US adults, 1960–2008. Social science & medicine 75: 109–119, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCullough, K. P., Morgenstern, H., Saran, R., Herman, W. H., & Robinson, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Arbor Research Collaborative for Health (US)
  • Epidemiology and
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
McCullough, Keith P.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2018-12-17
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
127-135
ISSN
  • 1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-3450
OpenAlex
W2905034532
Cited by
353
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
25.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092926)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (HHSN276201400001C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Keywords
end-stage renal disease, ESRD incidence, population projections, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, renal replacement therapy, chronic kidney disease progression, healthcare resource planning
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cause of Death, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, United States, Models, Statistical, Comorbidity, Incidence, Prevalence, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review