Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients

KASISKE, BERTRAM L., VAZQUEZ, MIGUEL A., HARMON, WILLIAM E., BROWN, ROBERT S., DANOVITCH, GABRIEL M., GASTON, ROBERT S., ROTH, DAVID, SCANDLING, JOHN D., SINGER, GARY G.·2000·Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Abstract

Abstract. Many complications after renal transplantation can be prevented if they are detected early. Guidelines have been developed for the prevention of diseases in the general population, but there are no comprehensive guidelines for the prevention of diseases and complications after renal transplantation. Therefore, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Transplantation developed these guidelines to help physicians and other health care workers provide optimal care for renal transplant recipients. The guidelines are also intended to indirectly help patients receive the access to care that they need to ensure long-term allograft survival, by attempting to systematically define what that care encompasses. The guidelines are applicable to all adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, and they cover the outpatient screening for and prevention of diseases and complications that commonly occur after renal transplantation. They do not cover the diagnosis and treatment of diseases and complications after they become manifest, and they do not cover the pretransplant evaluation of renal transplant candidates. The guidelines are comprehensive, but they do not pretend to cover every aspect of care. As much as possible, the guidelines are evidence-based, and each recommendation has been given a subjective grade to indicate the strength of evidence that supports the recommendation. It is hoped that these guidelines will provide a framework for additional discussion and research that will improve the care of renal transplant recipients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1681/asn.v11suppl_1s1

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
KASISKE, B. L., VAZQUEZ, M. A., HARMON, W. E., BROWN, R. S., DANOVITCH, G. M., GASTON, R. S., ROTH, D., SCANDLING, J. D., & SINGER, G. G.
Venue
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2000-10
Volume
11
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S1-S86
ISSN
1046-6673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123424103
Cited by
634
References
8
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1681/asn.v11suppl_1s1
The paper
KASISKE, B. L., VAZQUEZ, M. A., HARMON, W. E., BROWN, R. S., DANOVITCH, G. M., GASTON, R. S., ROTH, D., SCANDLING, J. D., & SINGER, G. G. (2000). Recommendations for the Outpatient Surveillance of Renal Transplant Recipients. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.v11suppl_1s1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.