The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Second-Generation Bioethanol Production from Residual Biomass
Open accessAbstract
In the context of climate change and the depletion of fossil fuels, there is a great need for alternatives to petroleum in the transport sector.This review provides an overview of the production of second generation bioethanol, which is distinguished from the first generation and subsequent generations of biofuels by its use of lignocellulosic biomass as raw material.The structural components of the lignocellulosic biomass such as cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, are presented along with technological unit steps including pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis, fermentation, distillation and dehydration.The purpose of the pretreatment step is to increase the surface area of carbohydrate available for enzymatic saccharification, while minimizing the content of inhibitors.Performing the enzymatic hydrolysis releases fermentable sugars, which are converted by microbial catalysts into ethanol.The hydrolysates obtained after the pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis contain a wide spectrum of sugars, predominantly glucose and xylose.Genetically engineered microorganisms are therefore needed to carry out co-fermentation.The excess of harmful inhibitors in the hydrolysate, such as weak organic acids, furan derivatives and phenol components, can be removed by detoxification before fermentation.Effective saccharification further requires using exogenous hemicellulases and cellulolytic enzymes.Conventional species of distiller's yeast are unable to ferment pentoses into ethanol, and only a very few natural microorganisms, including yeast species like Candida shehatae, Pichia (Scheffersomyces) stipitis, and Pachysolen tannophilus, metabolize xylose to ethanol.Enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation can be performed in a number of ways: by separate saccharification and fermentation, simultaneous saccharification and fermentation or consolidated bioprocessing.Pentose-fermenting microorganisms can be obtained through genetic engineering, by introducing xylose-encoding genes into metabolism of a selected microorganism to optimize its use of xylose accumulated in the hydrolysate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251
Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M., & Negro, M. J. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093 · Cited by 3,912
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871
Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production
Olsson, L., & Hahn-Hägerdal, B. (1996) · Enzyme and Microbial Technology · doi:10.1016/0141-0229(95)00157-3 · Cited by 783
Singh, A., & Olsen, S. I. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.012 · Cited by 471
Zhou, H., Cheng, J.-S., Wang, B. L., Fink, G. R., & Stephanopoulos, G. (2012) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2012.07.011 · Cited by 287
Cited by
Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization
Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 · Cited by 878
Kumar, M., Sun, Y., Rathour, R., Pandey, A., Thakur, I. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137116 · Cited by 472
Algae as green energy reserve: Technological outlook on biofuel production
Anto, S., Mukherjee, S. S., Muthappa, R., Mathimani, T., Deviram, G., Kumar, S. S., Verma, T. N., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125079 · Cited by 277
Sustainable valorization of sugar industry waste: status, opportunities, and challenges
Meghana, M., & Shastri, Y. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122929 · Cited by 201
Padder, S. A., Khan, R., & Rather, R. A. (2024) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107220 · Cited by 97
Lu, H., Yadav, V., Bilal, M., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132574 · Cited by 96
Mumtaz, M., Baqar, Z., Hussain, N., Afifa, Bilal, M., Azam, H. M. H., Baqir, Q.-U.-A., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2022) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122840 · Cited by 71
Environmental and economic analysis of bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses and agave juice
Parascanu, M. M., Sanchez, N., Sandoval-Salas, F., Carreto, C. M., Soreanu, G., & Sanchez-Silva, L. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15471-4 · Cited by 66
Eraky, M., Elsayed, M., Qyyum, M. A., Ai, P., & Tawfik, A. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2022.113708 · Cited by 50
Ethanol production by Klebsiella sp. SWET4 using banana peel as feasible substrate
Sarkar, D., Prajapati, S., Poddar, K., & Sarkar, A. (2022) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-020-00880-1 · Cited by 27
Ding, Z., Ge, Y., Sar, T., Kumar, V., Harirchi, S., Binod, P., Sirohi, R., Sindhu, R., Wu, P., Lin, F., et al. (2023) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128793 · Cited by 26
Retractedcazy_webscraper: local compilation and interrogation of comprehensive CAZyme datasets
Hobbs, E. E. M., Gloster, T. M., & Pritchard, L. (2023) · Microbial Genomics · doi:10.1099/mgen.0.001086 · Cited by 15
Ferreira, M. A. D. M., & Silveira, W. B. D. (2024) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2024.109471 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Lodz University of Technology, F. O. B. A. F. S., Robak, K., Balcerek, M., & Lodz University of Technology, F. O. B. A. F. S.
- Venue
- Food Technology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-187
- ISSN
- 1330-9862 (ISSN-L)
- 1334-2606
- OpenAlex
- W2782873761
- Cited by
- 649
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.