Cited by 5Microencapsulation and Drying ProcessesProteins in Food SystemsEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Microwave Encapsulation of Peanut Oil in Protein-Polysaccharide Complex

Open access
Bhuva, Sachin S., Dhamsaniya, Navnit K., Marviya, Gopal V.·2024·Food Technology and Biotechnology

Abstract

Research background. Peanut oil (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a rich source of unsaturated fatty acids. Its consumption has been reported to have biological effects on human health. Unsaturated, especially polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) found in peanut oil are highly susceptible to oxidation, leading to the formation of harmful compounds during processing and storage. The aim of this study is to prevent the oxidation of peanut oil PUFA by encapsulation in a protein-polysaccharide complex using microwave drying. Experimental approach. The combined effect of corn starch (CS) and whey protein isolate (WPI) was evaluated for ultrasound-assisted microwave encapsulation of peanut oil to prevent oxidative degradation. The effect of independent parameters, viz. CS:WPI mass ratio (1:1 to 5:1), lecithin mass fraction (0–5 %), ultrasonication time (0–10 min) and microwave power (150–750 W) on the encapsulation of peanut oil was evaluated using response surface methodology (RSM). The process responses, viz. viscosity and stability of the emulsion, encapsulation efficiency, peroxide value, antioxidant activity, free fatty acids (FFA), moisture, angle of repose and flowability (Hausner ratio (HR) and Carr’s Index (CI)) were recorded and analysed to optimize the independent variables. Results and conclusions. The viscosity of all emulsions prepared for encapsulation by ultrasonication ranged from 0.0069 to 0.0144 Pa·s and more than 90 % of prepared combinations were stable over 7 days. The observed encapsulation efficiency of peanut oil was 21.82–74.25 %. The encapsulation efficiency was significantly affected by the CS:WPI mass ratio and ultrasonication. The peroxide value, antioxidant activity and FFA ranged from 1.789 to 3.723 mg/kg oil, 19.81–72.62 % and 0.042–0.127 %, respectively. Physical properties such as moisture content, angle of repose, HR and CI were 1.94–8.70 %, 46.5–58.3°, 1.117–1.246 and 10.48–22.14 %, respectively. The physical properties were significantly affected by surface properties of the capsules. The higher efficiency (74.25 %) of peanut oil encapsulation was achieved under optimised conditions of CS:WPI mass ratio 1.25, 0.25 % lecithin, 9.99 min ultrasonication and 355.41 W microwave power. Novelty and scientific contribution. The results of this work contribute to the fields of food science and technology by providing a practical approach to preserving the nutritional quality of peanut oil and improving its stability through encapsulation, thereby promoting its potential health benefits to consumers and applications in various industries such as dairy and bakery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17113/ftb.62.01.24.8206

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modified proteins by microwave treatment could encapsulate smaller oil droplets with larger specific surface areas in emulsion gels, facilitating the hydrolysis of oil droplets by digestive enzymes.

    “the modified proteins by microwave treatment could encapsulate smaller oil droplets with larger specific surface areas in emulsion gels, facilitating the hydrolysis of oil droplets by digestive enzymes”

    From Designing Protein Gels for Nutrient Delivery: From Formulation to Digestion (2026) · cites this paper as Bhuva et al. 2024

    The Methods and Conclusions describe microwave-assisted encapsulation of peanut oil using a whey-protein–corn-starch complex. The Results and Discussion attributes smaller particles and greater surface area to ultrasonication, not microwave modification of proteins. Our copy does not address emulsion gels or hydrolysis by digestive enzymes; no page numbers were provided. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [5]Shad MA Pervez H Zafar ZI Nawaz H Khan H. Physicochemical properties, fatty acid profile and antioxidant activity of peanut oil. Pak J Bot. 2012; 44(1): 435– 40.
  2. [7]Cobb WY, Johnson BR. Physicochemical properties of peanuts. In: Peanuts: Culture and uses. Alexandria, VA, USA: American Peanut Research and Education Society (APRES); 1973. pp. 209-56.
  3. [8]Misra JB Girdhar V Jain VK Dhamsaniya NK. Quality attributes of peanut butter prepared from some Indian groundnut cultivars. Int Arachis Newsl. 2006; 26: 38– 40.
  4. [9]Bhuva SS Dhamsaniya NK. Encapsulation of vegetable oils for enhancing oxidative stability of PUFA. Biol Forum Int J. 2023; 15(2): 271– 84.
  5. [30]Official Method AOAC. 922.11. Free fatty acids. Rockville, MD, USA: AOAC International; 1964. pp. 72-81.
  6. [47]Sims RJ. Spray dried emulsion. Develop Food Sci. 1989; 19: 495– 509.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhuva, S. S., Dhamsaniya, N. K., & Marviya, G. V.
Affiliations
  • Junagadh Agricultural University (IN)
  • Polytechnic in Agro-Processing, Junagadh Agricultural University, 362001 Junagadh, Gujarat, India
Corresponding author
Bhuva, Sachin S.
Venue
Food Technology and Biotechnology
Published
2024-01-07
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
78-88
ISSN
  • 1330-9862 (ISSN-L)
  • 1334-2606
OpenAlex
W4390650162
Cited by
4
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Technology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hrčak Portal of scientific journals of Croatia (University Computing Centre) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
protein-polysaccharide complexes, corn starch, whey protein isolate, ultrasound-assisted encapsulation, microwave drying, lipid oxidation, polyunsaturated fatty acids, encapsulation efficiency, emulsion stability, peroxide value, antioxidant activity, free fatty acids, Hausner ratio, Carr's index, flowability, lecithin, response surface methodology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review