Cited by 39International Development and AidGlobal Health and SurgeryPublic health and occupational medicine

Donor data vacuuming

Open access
Gimbel, Sarah, Chilundo, Baltazar, Kenworthy, Nora, Inguane, Celso, Citrin, David, Chapman, Rachel, Sherr, Kenneth, Pfeiffer, James·2018·Medicine Anthropology Theory

Abstract

In this essay, we seek to understand how the stunning rise of data vacuuming, necessitated by the pretense of ‘partnership’ within global health, has fundamentally altered how routine health data in poor countries is collected, analyzed, prioritized, and used to inform management and policy. Writing as a team of authors with experiences on multiple sides of global health partnerships in the United States, Mozambique, Nepal, Lesotho, Kenya, and Cote d’Ivoire, we argue that solidarity-based partnership between donor and recipient countries is impossible when evidence production and management is effectively outsourced to external organizations to meet the criteria of donor partners. Specifically, to meet the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, equity-oriented strategies are critically needed to create data collection, analysis, and use activities that are mutually beneficial and sustainable.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17157/mat.5.2.537

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Farmer, Paul, Jim Yong Kim., Arthur Kleinman, and Matthew Basilico. 2013. 'Introduction'. In Reimaging Global Health, edited by Paul Farmer, Jim Yong Kim, Arthur Kleinman, and Matthew Basilico, 1-14. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  2. Hoskin, Keith. 1996. 'The "Awful Idea of Accountability": Inscribing People into the Measurement of Objects'. In Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing, edited by Rolland Munor and Jan Mouritsen, 265-82. London: International Thomson Business Press.
  3. Nichter, Mark. 2008. Global Health: Why Cultural Perceptions, Social Representations and Biolpolitics Matter. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  4. Owiredu, Morkor, Nita Bellare, Christine Musanhu, and Taiwo Oyelade. 2017. 'Building Health System Capacity through Implementation Research: Experience of INSPIREV-Multi-Country Implementation Research Project'. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome 75 (S2): S240-47.
  5. Power, Michael. 1994. The Audit Explosion. London: White Dove Press.
  6. Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society. London: Oxford University Press.
  7. Smith, Daniel Jordan. 2007. A Culture of Corruption. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. Strathern, Marilyn. 2000. 'New Accountabilities'. In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, edited by Marilyn Strathern, 1-18. Oxon, UK: Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gimbel, S., Chilundo, B., Kenworthy, N., Inguane, C., Citrin, D., Chapman, R., Sherr, K., & Pfeiffer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Washington Bothell (US)
  • Georgia Tech-Europe (FR)
Venue
Medicine Anthropology Theory
Published
2018-05-15
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
99
ISSN
2405-691X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804899213
Cited by
39
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine Anthropology Theory (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public health and occupational medicine
Keywords
global health partnerships, donor-recipient relations, health data collection, evidence generation, Sustainable Development Goals, health policy, data sovereignty, low-income countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review