Cited by 163International Development and AidHealthcare Systems and ReformsPublic health and occupational medicine

Strengthening Health Systems in Poor Countries: A Code of Conduct for Nongovernmental Organizations

Open access
Pfeiffer, James, Johnson, Wendy, Fort, Meredith, Shakow, Aaron, Hagopian, Amy, Gloyd, Steve, Gimbel-Sherr, Kenneth·2008·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

The challenges facing efforts in Africa to increase access to antiretroviral HIV treatment underscore the urgent need to strengthen national health systems across the continent. However, donor aid to developing countries continues to be disproportionately channeled to international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) rather than to ministries of health. The rapid proliferation of NGOs has provoked "brain drain" from the public sector by luring workers away with higher salaries, fragmentation of services, and increased management burdens for local authorities in many countries. Projects by NGOs sometimes can undermine the strengthening of public primary health care systems. We argue for a return to a public focus for donor aid, and for NGOs to adopt a code of conduct that establishes standards and best practices for NGO relationships with public sector health systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2007.125989

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In other sub-Saharan African contexts, systems weaknesses, gaps in local capacity, and perceived lack of transparency have been found to contribute to the decision for external actors to implement parallel structures and vertical programmes that introduce health sector fragmentation.

    “It has been noted in other sub-Saharan African contexts that systems weaknesses, gaps in local capacity, and perceived lack of transparency have been found to contribute to the decision for external actors to implement parallel structures and vertical programmes that introduce health sector fragmentation [1, 4, 29, 32, 38, 42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeiffer, J., Johnson, W., Fort, M., Shakow, A., Hagopian, A., Gloyd, S., & Gimbel-Sherr, K.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2008-12
Volume
98
Issue
12
Pages
2134-2140
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2127281163
Cited by
163
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
28.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI027757)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › International Development and Aid
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public health and occupational medicine
Keywords
non-governmental organizations, codes of conduct, health system strengthening, brain drain, primary care, Africa
MeSH terms
Africa, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Emigration and Immigration, Humans, International Agencies, International Cooperation, Organizations, Poverty, Global Health, HIV Infections, Public Health Practice, Guidelines as Topic, Anti-HIV Agents, Benchmarking, Codes of Ethics, Public-Private Sector Partnerships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review