The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Susceptibility of Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Clostridium perfringensto organic acids and monolaurin
Open accessAbstract
The antimicrobial activity of fatty acids, monolaurin, citric, succinic, fumaric, malic and lactic acid was determined in cultures of two strains of Escherichia coli, three strains of Salmonella sp. and two strains of Clostridium perfringens. Antimicrobial activity was expressed as minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) that prevented growth and glucose utilization in treated cultures. Caprylic acid was the only acid inhibiting glucose utilization in all cultures. Its MIC varied from 1 to 3 mg/ml. Strains CCM 3954 and CCM 4225 of E. coli were inhibited also by capric acid at 5 mg/ml. Strains CCM 4435T and CNCTC 5459 of Cl. perfringens were inhibited by medium-chain fatty acids (C8 to C14), oleic acid and one strain also by linoleic acid. The minimum MICs were those of lauric and myristic acid (between 0.1 and 0.2 mg/ml). Growth of Cl. perfringens, but not other bacteria, was inhibited also by monoglyceride of lauric acid (MIC = 3 mg/ml), and by citric acid (MIC = 4 mg/ml). Inhibitory effects of other acids were not observed at 5 mg/ml. Caprylic and lauric acid did not influence the K+ permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane in cells of E. coli CCM 4225 and Cl. perfringens CCM 4435T, respectively. In cultures of both strains of E. coli treated with caprylic acid at 5 mg/ml, and in those of Cl. perfringens CCM 4435T treated with lauric acid at 1 mg/ml, or with its monoglyceride at 5 mg/ml, the transmission electron microscopy revealed damage of cytoplasmatic structures. In cells of Cl. perfringens the separation of inner and outer membranes was apparent, the integrity of the outer membrane, however, was maintained. It can be concluded that medium-chain fatty acids are more efficient antimicrobials than other, more polar organic acids tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spranghers, T., Ottoboni, M., Klootwijk, C., Ovyn, A., Deboosere, S., De Meulenaer, B., Michiels, J., Eeckhout, M., De Clercq, P., & De Smet, S. (2017) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.8081 · Cited by 970
Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food.
Wang, Y.-S., & Shelomi, M. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6100091 · Cited by 812
Meneguz, M., Schiavone, A., Gai, F., Dama, A., Lussiana, C., Renna, M., & Gasco, L. (2018) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9127 · Cited by 532
The utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals
Ng, W., & Koh, C. (2017) · Reviews in Aquaculture · doi:10.1111/raq.12141 · Cited by 331
Spranghers, T., Michiels, J., Vrancx, J., Ovyn, A., Eeckhout, M., De Clercq, P., & De Smet, S. (2018) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.08.012 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Skrivanova, E., Marounek, M., Benda, V., & Brezina, P.
- Venue
- Veterinární medicína
- Published
- 2006-03-31
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 81-88
- ISSN
- 0375-8427 (ISSN-L)
- 1805-9392
- OpenAlex
- W2189179437
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- cs
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Susceptibility of Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Clostridium perfringensto organic acids and monolaurin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17221/5524-vetmed
- The paper
- Skrivanova, E., Marounek, M., Benda, V., & Brezina, P. (2006). Susceptibility of Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Clostridium perfringensto organic acids and monolaurin. Veterinární medicína. https://doi.org/10.17221/5524-vetmed
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.