Cited by 61Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyEdible Oils Quality and Analysis

Determination of in vitro antibacterial activity of plant oils containing medium-chain fatty acids against gram- positive pathogenic and gut commensal bacteria.

Open access
Hovorková, Petra, Laloučková, Klára, Skřivanová, Eva·2018·Czech Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Increasing antibiotic resistance has led to a ban on antibiotic use in feed additives in the EU. Therefore, new non-antibiotic, pathogen-inhibiting agents are urgently needed. Inhibitory effects of eight plant oils containing medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) were evaluated against Gram-positive pathogenic and beneficial bacteria. The oils tested were palm, red palm, palm kernel (Elaeis guineensis), coconut (Cocos nucifera), babassu (Attalea speciosa), murumuru (Astrocaryum murumuru), tucuma (Astrocaryum vulgare), and Cuphea oil (Cuphea ignea); the method used was broth microdilution, and the findings were expressed as minimum inhibitory concentration (80%). Both hydrolyzed and unhydrolyzed forms of the oils were tested. MCFA hydrolysis was catalyzed by porcine pancreas lipase. The selective effect of the hydrolyzed forms of tested oils was highly evident. While the hydrolyzed oils were active against all tested bacteria (Clostridium perfringens, Enterococcus cecorum, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus), at 0.14-4.5 mg/ml, the same oils did not show any effect on commensal bacteria (Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp.). Tucuma and Cuphea seed oils showed the strongest antibacterial activity. Unhydrolyzed forms of all tested oils exerted no antibacterial effect against any test bacteria. This study, thus, forms a basis for the development of selective inhibitors in animal husbandry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17221/70/2017-cjas

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hovorková, P., Laloučková, K., & Skřivanová, E.
Affiliations
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
Corresponding author
Skřivanová, Eva
Venue
Czech Journal of Animal Science
Published
2018-03-31
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
119-125
ISSN
  • 1212-1819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1805-9309
OpenAlex
W2792105006
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
FWCI
5.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Czech Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Česká Zemědělská Univerzita v Praze
  • Ministerstvo Zemědělství
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Keywords
medium-chain fatty acids, vegetable oils, antibacterial activity, Gram-positive bacteria, gut commensal bacteria, babassu oil, palm oil, coconut oil, non-antibiotic feed additives, antibiotic alternatives, Clostridium perfringens, Enterococcus cecorum, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, pigs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review