The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Strategies of Turkish Female Managers to Break Glass Ceiling
Abstract
The number of female employees in the business world is increasing daily; however, managerial positions have disadvantages. They are not significantly represented in corporate leadership positions. The fragile and transparent but real barrier that prevents qualified women from advancing to senior management positions has been conceptualised as the glass ceiling in the literature. This study aims to identify and conceptualise Turkish female managers' strategies to break the glass ceiling through the qualitative research method within the framework of elements that create a glass ceiling, such as gender discrimination and gender prejudices in society, organisational culture, some female-specific behavioural faults, personal compromises and encouragers for a career. Content analysis of the interviews conducted with senior female managers was carried out using the MAXQDA software program. As a result of the study, it has been determined that Turkish female managers apply different strategies in three areas: work-life and family balance, professional life, and career path. These are inspiring strategies for women at all management levels, which they can use to advance their career paths. Among these strategies, the approach that the organisation can support will also be a guide for human resources management practitioners, managers and leaders, and organisational structure and culture designers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0023557 · Cited by 1,748
Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.
Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.105.1.51 · Cited by 685
Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002 · Cited by 492
Sullivan, C., & Lewis, S. (2001) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00125 · Cited by 472
Female Presence on Corporate Boards: A Multi-Country Study of Environmental Context
Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9656-1 · Cited by 465
Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling
Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003 · Cited by 444
Work-family conflict in the dual-career family
Higgins, C. A., Duxbury, L. E., & Irving, R. H. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90004-q · Cited by 433
Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy
Kanter, R. M. (1989) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1989.00077.x · Cited by 410
The Ultimate Glass Ceiling Revisited: The Presence of Women on Corporate Boards
Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/b:busi.0000022125.95758.98 · Cited by 376
The "Good Manager": Masculine or Androgynous?
Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1979) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255597 · Cited by 321
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Basow, S.A. (2013), “Women in Management: Does Manager Equal Male?”, in: A.P. Michele (ed.), Women and Management: Global Issues and Promising Solutions Vol. 1 (3-17), ABC- CLIO.
- Carnevale, P. & S.C. Stone (1994), “Diversity beyond the golden rule”, Training and Development, 48(10), 22-39.
- Colella, A. & E. King (eds.) (2018), The Oxford Handbook of Workplace Discrimination, Oxford University Press.
- Goleman, D. (2004), “What makes a leader”, Harvard Business Review, (82), 82-91.
- Jauhar, J. & V. Lau (2018), “The ‘Glass Ceiling’ and Women’s Career Advancement to Top Management: The Moderating Effect of Social Support”, Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 10(1), 163-178.
- Meyerson, D.E. & J.K. Fletcher (2000), “A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling”, Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 126-136.
- Meyerson, D.E. & J.K. Fletcher (2000), “A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling”, Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 126-136.
- Özenç, M.Ç. & M.A. Salepçioğlu (2019), “Erkek egemen işlerde çalışan kadınlarda cam tavan sendromu ve iş motivasyonu”, Anadolu Bil Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 14(56), 313-333.
- Rüzgar, N. (2020), “Glass Ceiling Barriers in Front of White Collar Women Employees: A Research in Bursa”, in: V. Krystev et al. (eds.), Advances in Social Science Research (391-406), St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, Sofia.
- Shaji, J.K. & J.P Shaji (2020), “Career Barriers for Women Executives in India and the Glass Ceiling Syndrome”, Journal of the Social Sciences, 23(2), 552-560.
Cited by
Barriers to Leadership: Experiences of Women Leaders in Business and Politics
Lasso Quintero, M. I., Galeano Trilleras, H., & Valencia Mosquera, M. C. (2024) · Revista CEA · doi:10.22430/24223182.2866 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaya, Y., & Tamer, G.
- Affiliations
- NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
- BEYKENT UNIVERSITY
- Venue
- Sosyoekonomi
- Publisher
- Sosyoekonomi
- Published
- 2024-04-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 60
- Pages
- 291-315
- ISSN
- 1305-5577
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 58
- Funders
- Role of the funding source: The financial support for the conduct of the research has been provided by Scientific Research Projects Application and Research Center in Istanbul Gelisim University (DUP-170220)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
