Cited by 492Gender Diversity and InequalitySocial and Intergroup PsychologyMedia, Gender, and Advertising

The strong, sensitive type: effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders

Johnson, Stefanie K., Murphy, Susan Elaine, Zewdie, Selamawit, Reichard, Rebecca J.·2008·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • White and masculine leadership standards can result in biased perceptions and evaluations of women.

    “These White and masculine leadership standards can result in biased perceptions and evaluations of people who do not fit the image of a leader, such as women (Eagly & Carli, 2007;Johnson, Murphy, Zewdie & Reichard, 2008;Koenig, Eagly, Mitchell, & Ristikari, 2011;Rosette, Leonardelli, & Phillips, 2008).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Johnson, Murphy, Zewdie & Reichard, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Claremont McKenna College (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Stefanie K.
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
39-60
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027543370
Cited by
492
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
34.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
gender stereotypes, leadership prototypes, role congruity theory, women in leadership, leader evaluation, gender bias, sensitivity, masculinity, strength, tyranny, leadership effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review