Cited by 27LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Understanding sexual orientation and health in Canada: Who are we capturing and who are we missing using the Statistics Canada sexual orientation question?

Open access
Dharma, Christoffer, Bauer, Greta R.·2017·Canadian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objective Public health research on inequalities in Canada depends heavily on population data sets such as the Canadian Community Health Survey. While sexual orientation has three dimensions - identity, behaviour and attraction - Statistics Canada and public health agencies assess sexual orientation with a single questionnaire item on identity, defined behaviourally. This study aims to evaluate this item, to allow for clearer interpretation of sexual orientation frequencies and inequalities. Methods Through an online convenience sampling of Canadians ≥14 years of age, participants (n = 311) completed the Statistics Canada question and a second set of sexual orientation questions. Results The single-item question had an 85.8% sensitivity in capturing sexual minorities, broadly defined by their sexual identity, lifetime behaviour and attraction. Kappa statistic for agreement between the single item and sexual identity was 0.89; with past year, lifetime behaviour and attraction were 0.39, 0.48 and 0.57 respectively. The item captured 99.3% of those with a sexual minority identity, 84.2% of those with any lifetime same-sex partners, 98.4% with a past-year same-sex partner, and 97.8% who indicated at least equal attraction to same-sex persons. Conclusion Findings from Statistics Canada surveys can be best interpreted as applying to those who identify as sexual minorities. Analyses using this measure will underidentify those with same-sex partners or attractions who do not identify as a sexual minority, and should be interpreted accordingly. To understand patterns of sexual minority health in Canada, there is a need to incorporate other dimensions of sexual orientation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17269/cjph.108.5848

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dharma, C., & Bauer, G. R.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Dharma, Christoffer
Venue
Canadian Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-01
Volume
108
Issue
1
Pages
e21-e26
ISSN
  • 0008-4263 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-7476
OpenAlex
W2605393996
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (130489, 130489_1)
  • Institute of Gender and Health (MOP-130489)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
sexual orientation, sexual minority health, sexual identity, sexual behavior, sexual attraction, same-sex couples, measurement sensitivity, underidentification, health disparities, Canadian Community Health Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Canada, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Behavior, Reproducibility of Results, Health Status Disparities, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review