Cited by 6Mental Health Research TopicsSuicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health via Writing

A proof of concept study on individual trends in suicidal ideation: an ecological momentary assessment study of 5 patients over three months.

Open access
Nuij, Chani, Van Ballegooijen, Wouter, Smit, Arnout C., De Beurs, Derek, De Winter, Remco F.P., O’Connor, Rory C., Kerkhof, Ad, Smit, Jan H +1 more·2023·Journal for Person-Oriented Research

Abstract

Background: Suicidal ideation (SI) is a significant and long-lasting mental health problem, with a third of individuals still experiencing SI after two years. To date, most Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) studies of SI have assessed its day-to-day course over one to four consecutive weeks and found no consistent trends in average SI severity over time. Aim: The current proof of concept study assessed daily fluctuations of SI over a time span of 3 to 6 months to explore whether individual trends in SI severity could be detected, and if so, if the trajectory of changes were gradual or sudden. The secondary aim was to explore whether changes in SI severity could be detected at an early stage. Method: Five adult outpatients with depression and SI used an EMA app on their smartphone in addition to their regular treatment for 3 to 6 months, where SI was assessed 3 times a day. To detect trends in SI for each patient, three models were tested: a null model, a gradual change model and a sudden change model. To detect changes in SI before a new plateau was reached, Early Warning Signals and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average control charts were used. Results: In each patient, average SI severity had a unique trajectory of sudden and/or gradual changes. Additionally, in some patients, increases in both sudden and gradual SI could be detected at an early stage. Conclusions: The study presents a first indication of unique individual trends in SI severity over a 3 to 6 months period. Though replication in a larger sample is needed to test how well results generalize, a first proof-of-concept is provided that both sudden and gradual changes in SI severity may be detectable at an early stage using the dynamics of time-series data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17505/jpor.2023.25265

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Acute suicidal behaviors typically fluctuate.

    “While acute suicidal behaviors typically fluctuate,31,32 patients need to prove a well-considered and recurrent death wish to be eligible for MAID.”

    From Requests for Medical Assistance in Dying by Young Dutch People With Psychiatric Disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Discussion reports that suicidal ideation severity fluctuated in five outpatients, and the Introduction cites prior studies finding fluctuations over hours. The cited paper addresses suicidal thoughts, not acute suicidal behaviors, so it does not fully support the broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuij, C., Van Ballegooijen, W., Smit, A. C., De Beurs, D., De Winter, R. F. P., O’Connor, R. C., Kerkhof, A., Smit, J. H., & Riper, H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Nuij, Chani
Venue
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Published
2023-06-17
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
42-50
ISSN
  • 2002-0244 (ISSN-L)
  • 2003-0177
OpenAlex
W4381248909
Cited by
6
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal for Person-Oriented Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
suicidal ideation, individual trajectories, gradual change, abrupt change, early warning indicators, EWMA control chart, time series dynamics, depression, smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment, suicide risk identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review