CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Archaeology and Rock Art StudiesAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryArchaeological and Geological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ideología y diferenciación social: patrones de asentamiento y localización del arte rupestre en el valle de Tena, centro de Colombia

Open access
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Arguello, Pedro·2017·Boletín de Antropología
DOI 10.17533/udea.boan.v32n54a05
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The debate about political power source of Muisca chiefs is far from being settled. There is evidence to support some degree of economic differentiation, parallel with arguments suggesting that perhaps the power of these chiefs was supported ideologically. However, the ideological aspect is precisely the less studied, partly because of the difficulties involved in constructing correlates of ideological manipulation. This article studies the possible process of sacralization of a set of petroglyphs located in the Valley of Tena, a region where the formation of a supra-local community in which early processes of political centralization were given, has been documented. Spatial analysis of the relationship between settlement patterns and petroglyphs at regional and community level are carried out in order to assess the possible use of cave art as an ideological control mechanism by emerging elites.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17533/udea.boan.v32n54a05

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 11. Bednarik, Robert (2007). Rock Art science. The Scientific Study of Paleoart. Aryan Books International, New Delhi.
  2. 16. Boada, Ana (2007). La evolución de jerarquía social en un cacicazgo muisca de los Andes septentrio¬nales de Colombia. University of Pittsburgh-Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia, Bogotá/Pittsburgh.
  3. 17. Boada, Ana (2009). "La producción de textiles de algodón en la política económica de los cacicazgos muiscas de los Andes colombianos". En: Sánchez, Carlos (ed.), Economía, prestigio y poder: perspectivas desde la arqueología. Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia, Bogotá, pp. 272-313.
  4. 18. Boada, Ana (2013). "De peque-os grupos locales al lugar central del cacicazgo de Bogotá (Colombia)". En: Palumbo, Scott; Boada, Ana; Locascio, William y Menzies, Adam (eds.), Enfoques de escala múltiple en el estudio de la organización social y el cambio en el área itsmo-colombiana. Uni¬versidad de los Andes-University of Pittsburgh-Universidad de Costa Rica, Bogotá/Pittsburgh/ San José, pp. 39-69.
  5. 25. Drennan, Robert, Christian Peterson, Gregory Indrisano, Teng Mingyu, Gideon Schelach, Zhu Yanping, Katheryn Linduff y Guo Zhizhing (2003) "Approaches to Regional Demographic Recons¬truction". En The Chifeng International Collaborative Archaeological Research Project (eds.), Regional Archaeology in Eastern Inner Mongolia: A Methodological Exploration. Science Press, Beijing, pp. 152-173.
  6. 26. Drennan, Robert y Christian Peterson (2011) "Methods for Regional Demographic Analysis". En The Chifeng International Collaborative Archaeological Research Project (eds.), Settlement Patterns in the Chifeng Region. University of Pittsburgh Center for Comparative Archaeology, Pittsburgh, pp. 57-79.
  7. 27. Eagleton, Terry (2005). Ideología. Una introducción. Paidós, Barcelona.
  8. 32. Hyder, William (2004). "Locational Analysis in Rock-Art Studies". En: Chippindale, Christopher y Nash, George (eds.), Pictures in Place: Figured Landscapes of Rock-Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 85-101.
  9. 33. IGAC (2000) Estudio general de suelos y zonificación de tierras. IGAC, Gobernación de Cundina¬marca, Bogotá.
  10. 36. Langebaek, Carl (1995). Arqueología regional en el territorio muisca: Estudio de los Valles de Fúquene y Susa. University of Pittsburgh-Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia, Pittsburgh/ Bogotá.
  11. 37. Langebaek, Carl (2000). "Cacicazgos, orfebrería y política prehispánica: una perspectiva desde Co¬lombia". En: Arqueología del Área Intermedia, N.o 2, pp. 11-45.
  12. 38. Langebaek, Carl (2001). Arqueología regional en el valle de Leiva: procesos de ocupación humana en una región de los Andes orientales de Colombia. Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia, Bogotá.
  13. 39. Langebaek, Carl (2006). "De las palabras, las cosas y los recuerdos: El Infiernito, la arqueología, los documentos y la etnología en el estudio de la sociedad muisca". En: Gnecco, Cristóbal y Lan¬gebaek, Carl (eds.), Contra la tiranía tipológica en arqueología: una visión desde Suramérica. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, pp. 215-256.
  14. 40. Langebaek, Carl (2008). "Dos teorías sobre el poder político entre los muiscas. Un debate a favor del diálogo". En: Gamboa, Jorge (ed.), Los muiscas en los siglos xvi y xvii: miradas desde la arqueo¬logía, la antropología y la historia. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, pp. 64-93.
  15. 46. Navas, Alejandro y Angulo, Érika (2010). Los Guanes y el Arte Rupestre Xeriense. Fundación El Libro Total, Bucaramanga.
  16. 53. Potter, James (2000). "Ritual, Power, and Social Differentiation in Small-Scale Societies". En: Diehl, Michael (ed.), Hierarchies in Action: Cui Bono? Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Illinois, pp. 295-316.
  17. 57. Rodríguez, Elkin (2004). "Manifestaciones de arte rupestre en la vereda El Fute, municipio de Bojacá: reconocimiento y prospección arqueológica en el relleno sanitario Nuevo Mondo-edo". CISAN. Manuscrito sin publicar, Bogotá.
  18. 58. Rodríguez, Freddy (2011). "Prospección arqueológica en los contratos de concesión minera ECBN-01 y FAHI-01, municipio de Soacha, Cundinamarca". Ladrillera Santafé. Manuscrito sin publicar, Bogotá.
  19. 59. Rodríguez, Julio (2013). Ideología y liderazgo político en la periferia: una perspectiva desde el caci¬cazgo de Suta, valle de Leyva, entre los siglos xiii y xvi. Instituto Colombiano de Antropología e Historia, Bogotá.
  20. 61. Shock, Myrtle (2002). Rock art and settlement in the Owyhee uplands of southeastern Oregon. Tesis de Grado. Departamento de Antropología, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
  21. 62. Sognnes, Kalle (1987). "Rock Art and Settlement Pattern in the Bronze Age. Example from Stordal, Trondelas, Norway". En: Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 20, N.o 2, pp. 110-119.
  22. 66. Urbina, Fernando (1991). "Mitos y petroglifos en el río Caquetá". En: Boletín del Museo del Oro, N.o 30, pp. 3-41.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
de Colombia, U. P. Y. T., & Arguello, P.
Affiliations
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia (CO)
Venue
Boletín de Antropología
Publisher
Universidad de Antioquia
Published
2017-07-01
Volume
32
Issue
54
Pages
75-100
ISSN
0120-2510 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.17533/udea.boan.v32n54a05
OpenAlex
W2749130025
Cited by
3
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Boletín de Antropología (publishedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
Keywords
petroglyphs, rock art, Muisca, ideology, social differentiation, settlement patterns, centralization of power, sacralization, Tena valley, political power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review