Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ideology, Materialization, and Power Strategies

DeMarrais, Elizabeth, Castillo, Luis Jaime, Earle, Timothy·1996·Current Anthropology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/204472

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ideologies affect attitudes to production, surplus accumulation, circulation, and consumption, often producing different outcomes even if outward expressions look the same.

    “ideologies-a combination of overarching ideas and configuration of practices-operating at different cross-societal levels (DeMarrais et al. 1996) affect attitudes to production, surplus accumulation, circulation, and consumption, which often produce different outcomes, even if the outward expressions look the same (McIntosh 1999).”

    From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as DeMarrais et al. 1996

  • Iconography cannot be considered arbitrary, but rather the product of culturally determined requirements; as such it was an active means of communication, used to transmit ideological messages to a large number of people across extensive geographic areas.

    “Iconography cannot be considered arbitrary, but rather the product of a culturally determined requirements; as such they were an active means of a communication, used to transmit ideological messages to a large number of people across extensive geographic areas [19, 36].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DeMarrais, E., Castillo, L. J., & Earle, T.
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
1996-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
15-31
ISSN
  • 0011-3204
  • 1537-5382
Cited by
443
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review