Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 694

The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.

The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description

Open access
E. Roeckner, Georg Bäuml, Luca Bonaventura, Renate Brokopf, Monika Esch, M. A. Giorgetta, Stefan Hagemann, Ingo Kirchner, Luis Kornblueh, Elisa Manzini, A. Rhodin, Ulrich Schlese, Uwe Schulzweida, Adrian Mark Tompkins·2003·MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.17617/2.995269

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 694

Metadata

Authors
Roeckner, E., Bäuml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., & Tompkins, A. M.
Venue
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society)
Publisher
Max Planck Society
Published
2003-11-01
OpenAlex
W1568287675
Cited by
694
References
0
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17617/2.995269
The paper
Roeckner, E., Bäuml, G., Bonaventura, L., Brokopf, R., Esch, M., Giorgetta, M. A., Hagemann, S., Kirchner, I., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., Rhodin, A., Schlese, U., Schulzweida, U., & Tompkins, A. M. (2003). The atmospheric general circulation model ECHAM 5. PART I: Model description. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). https://doi.org/10.17617/2.995269

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.