The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits
Open accessAbstract
The knowledge-based theory of the firm suggests that knowledge is the organizational asset that enables sustainable competitive advantage in hyper-competitive environments. The emphasis on knowledge in today's organizations is based on the assumption that barriers to the transfer and replication of knowledge endow it with strategic importance. Many organizations are developing information systems designed specifically to facilitate the sharing and integration of knowledge. Such systems are referred to as Knowledge Management System (KMS). Because KMS are just beginning to appear in organizations, little research and field data exists to guide the development and implementation of such systems or to guide expectations of the potential benefits of such systems. This study provides an analysis of current practices and outcomes of KMS and the nature of KMS as they are evolving in fifty organizations. The findings suggest that interest in KMS across a variety of industries is very high, the technological foundations are varied, and the major concerns revolve around achieving the correct amount and type of accurate knowledge and garnering support for contributing to the KMS. Implications for practice and suggestions for future research are drawn from the study findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
POLANYI, M. (1997) · Knowledge in Organisations · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-x · Cited by 12,408
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.40 · Cited by 8,390
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
Reid, L. A., & Polanyi, M. (1959) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119338 · Cited by 7,538
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
The design of inquiring systems,
Jantsch, E. (1972) · Futures · doi:10.1016/0016-3287(72)90061-4 · Cited by 1,089
Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-Critical Philosophy
Kelly, M. (1963) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1963.03620250143044 · Cited by 552
Alavi, M., & Joachimsthaler, E. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249703 · Cited by 361
Self-citationLotus Notes®and Collaboration:Plus ça change...
Vandenbosch, B., & Ginzberg, M. J. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518134 · Cited by 122
Cited by
Abioye, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Akanbi, L., Ajayi, A., Davila Delgado, J. M., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., & Ahmed, A. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299 · Cited by 1,015
Understanding the Blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Arha, H. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610 · Cited by 960
Kamble, S., Gunasekaran, A., & Dhone, N. C. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1630772 · Cited by 687
Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective
(2001) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2001.11045676 · Cited by 677
Lin, T.-C., & Huang, C.-C. (2008) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.06.004 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.
- Venue
- Communications of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 1
- ISSN
- 1529-3181 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1487897302
- Cited by
- 1,535
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 173.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17705/1cais.00107
- The paper
- Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.00107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.