The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations?
Open accessAbstract
Enterprise architecture (EA) is the definition and representation of a high-level view of an enterprise’s business processes and IT systems, their interrelationships, and the extent to which these processes and systems are shared by different parts of the enterprise. EA aims to define a suitable operating platform to support an organisation’s future goals and the roadmap for moving towards this vision. Despite significant practitioner interest in the domain, understanding the value of EA remains a challenge. Although many studies make EA benefit claims, the explanations of why and how EA leads to these benefits are fragmented, incomplete, and not grounded in theory. This article aims to address this knowledge gap by focusing on the question: How does EA lead to organisational benefits? Through a careful review of EA literature, the paper consolidates the fragmented knowledge on EA benefits and presents the EA Benefits Model (EABM). The EABM proposes that EA leads to organisational benefits through its impact on four benefit enablers: Organisational Alignment, Information Availability, Resource Portfolio Optimisation, and Resource Complementarity. The article concludes with a discussion of a number of potential avenues for future research, which could build on the findings of this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171110 · Cited by 16,157
The Core Competence of the Corporation
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2006) · Strategische Unternehmungsplanung — Strategische Unternehmungsführung · doi:10.1007/3-540-30763-x_14 · Cited by 11,433
Strategic assets and organizational rent
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140105 · Cited by 8,425
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,357
Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution
Hammer, M., & Champy, J. (1993) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/s0007-6813(05)80064-3 · Cited by 6,455
Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers
Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. (1996) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099 · Cited by 4,672
Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.1999.5387096 · Cited by 3,498
A framework for information systems architecture
Zachman, J. A. (1987) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.263.0276 · Cited by 3,228
The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign
Davenport, T. H., & Short, J. E. (2011) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 3,023
Cited by
On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS
Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.26 · Cited by 485
Gong, Y., Yang, J., & Shi, X. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P.
- Venue
- Communications of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 28
- ISSN
- 1529-3181 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135961559
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 36.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17705/1cais.02810
- The paper
- Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.