Cited by 3,498Information Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentCorporate Governance and Management

Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations

Henderson, J. C., Venkatraman, H.·1999·IBM Systems Journal

Abstract

We have been asked on numerous occasions: “Which alignment perspective is the best?” As researchers and observers of strategic management phenomena, we do not believe that there is one universally superior mode to formulate and implement strategy. If there were, it would not be strategic because all firms would adopt it. The four dominant alignment perspectives that use the two strategies as the driver are equally useful and powerful in thinking about the role of I/T in organizational transformation. Indeed, we urge managers not to consider I/T as a panacea and consequently focus only on those two perspectives with I/T strategy as the starting point (namely, competitive potential and service level). Nor do we want to argue that business strategy should always be the starting point and adopt only the other two perspectives on strategic alignment. The potential for I/T impact is so varied and complex that the executive must consider these perspectives as alternative conceptual lenses and be prepared to continuously make adaptations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1147/sj.1999.5387096

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strategic alignment ensures that key principles like Equity and Sustainability are treated as core business objectives rather than secondary concerns.

    “This strategic alignment ensures that key principles like Equity and Sustainability are treated as core business objectives rather than secondary concerns, a concept central to leveraging technology for organizational transformation [82].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IBM Systems Journal
Publisher
IBM
Published
1999
Volume
38
Issue
2.3
Pages
472-484
ISSN
0018-8670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107604945
Cited by
3,498
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 136 · 2017: 185 · 2016: 130 · 2015: 222 · 2014: 222 · 2013: 224 · 2012: 209
FWCI
109.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IBM Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
Keywords
strategic alignment, IT strategy, organizational change, business strategy, competitive potential, level of service, business-IT relationship, strategic management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review