The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the adoption and development of intranets in large business organizations. The authors demonstrate that intranet technology introduces a host of new managerial and technical challenges and requires new approaches to IS development. Evidence from two European corporations indicates that the traditional division of labor and definition of work roles in IS development breaks down. The distinction between developers and users becomes increasingly blurred and new organizational roles and structures associated with intranets are emerging. However, ready-made organizational models for implementing and managing intranets do not exist and the two organizations in this study have followed two different approaches. One organization favors a "planned change" approach, emphasizing management control and careful planning. The other organization prefers an "improvisational" approach, emphasizing experimentation, innovation and local initiative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems1
Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249410 · Cited by 5,263
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Cited by
The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors
Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x · Cited by 2,207
Understanding online purchase intentions: contributions from technology and trust perspectives
van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000445 · Cited by 1,230
Roca, J. C., & Gagné, M. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.001 · Cited by 732
A proposed model of e-trust for electronic banking
Yousafzai, S. Y., Pallister, J. G., & Foxall, G. R. (2003) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(03)00130-5 · Cited by 583
User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- Technical University of Denmark, Bansler, J., Damsgaard, J., Aalborg University, Scheepers, R., Swinburne University of Technology, Havn, E., Technical University of Denmark, Thommesen, J., & Technical University of Denmark
- Venue
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-41
- ISSN
- 1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1533193701
- Cited by
- 523
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 47.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17705/1jais.00010
- The paper
- Technical University of Denmark, Bansler, J., Damsgaard, J., Aalborg University, Scheepers, R., Swinburne University of Technology, Havn, E., Technical University of Denmark, Thommesen, J., & Technical University of Denmark. (2000). Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
