Cited by 136Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Sellers’ Trust and Continued Use of Online Marketplaces

University of Arizona, Sun, Heshan·2010·Journal of the Association for Information Systems

Abstract

Despite the fact that more and more people are selling things online, the community of sellers is under-investigated by information systems researchers. This research explores the role of sellers’ trust in the continued use of online marketplaces. This research differentiates between the sellers’ trust in intermediaries and their trust in the community of buyers. In addition, the concept of trust is examined with a balanced view of cognitive and affective trust. A research model is developed. Empirical data collected from sellers at uBid.com confirm the research model and hypotheses. The findings show that, for online sellers, (1) both cognitive and affective components of trust matter; (2) trust in the intermediary impacts trust in the community of buyers through the trust transference mechanism; (3) trust influences sellers’ retention to online marketplaces indirectly via perceived usefulness and perceived enjoyment of using online marketplaces; and (4) perceived enjoyment is an important antecedent of sellers’ retention. This research has implications for information systems research and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17705/1jais.00226

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
University of Arizona, & Sun, H.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Sun, Heshan
Venue
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2010-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
182-211
ISSN
1536-9323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1858904504
Cited by
136
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
20.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
seller trust, online marketplaces, continued use, cognitive trust, affective trust, perceived usefulness, perceived enjoyment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review