CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45Information Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Education and Curriculum DevelopmentInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Literature Review on Strategic Information Systems Planning: Insights from the Past Decade

Open access
Griffith University, Amrollahi, Alireza, Ghapanchi, Amir Hossein, Griffith University, Talaei-Khoei, Amir Talaei-Khoei, University Technology Sydney·2013·Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems
DOI 10.17705/1pais.05203
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Strategic information system planning (SISP) has been an important concern for top business and information systems (IS) managers. This paper employs a systematic literature review approach for 12 top ranking IS journals in the past 10 years in order to classify them based on their focus levels, research topics, and research methods. Our search resulted in 45 papers which are categorized into four focus groups, three context groups and six topic groups. The results indicate that most of the research focus to date has been on the alignment and development of plans. Researchers have paid more attention to the context as the focus of research, the firm as research context and the quantitative approach as research method. The results may be beneficial to show new researchers the current status and research gaps and for practitioners who want to ascertain valuable topics in the literature that help them with their business problems. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pajais/vol5/iss2/4/

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17705/1pais.05203

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 5, Iss. 2 [2013], Art. 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 45

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Griffith University, Amrollahi, A., Ghapanchi, A. H., Griffith University, Talaei-Khoei, A. T.-K., & University Technology Sydney
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Publisher
Association for Information Systems
Published
2013
Pages
39-66
ISSN
  • 1943-7536 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7544
DOI
10.17705/1pais.05203
OpenAlex
W6738442
Cited by
45
References
70
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12
FWCI
6.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pacific Asia journal of the Association for Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
  • USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
strategic information systems planning, research trends, research gaps, business-IT alignment, information systems planning, research context, research methodology, information systems journals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review