The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Literature Review on Strategic Information Systems Planning: Insights from the Past Decade
Open accessAbstract
Strategic information system planning (SISP) has been an important concern for top business and information systems (IS) managers. This paper employs a systematic literature review approach for 12 top ranking IS journals in the past 10 years in order to classify them based on their focus levels, research topics, and research methods. Our search resulted in 45 papers which are categorized into four focus groups, three context groups and six topic groups. The results indicate that most of the research focus to date has been on the alignment and development of plans. Researchers have paid more attention to the context as the focus of research, the firm as research context and the quantitative approach as research method. The results may be beneficial to show new researchers the current status and research gaps and for practitioners who want to ascertain valuable topics in the literature that help them with their business problems. Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pajais/vol5/iss2/4/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“First, 17 highranked IS journals and conferences, among the considerable number of research conducted on trust in e-commerce, were selected as a representative of the whole body of knowledge and searched with a predefined set of keywords.”
From Buyers' trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: a synthesizing literature review (2022) · cites this paper as Amrollahi et al. 2013
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Porter, M. E. (1985) · Cited by 14,725
Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance
Ponter, M. E. (1998) · Cited by 5,821
(2004) · Cited by 5,198
Kaplan, B., DeGross, J. I., Wood-Harper, A. T., Wastell, D. G., & Truex, D. P., III (2004) · IFIP International Federation for Information Processing/IFIP · doi:10.1007/b115738 · Cited by 3,139
Chief executives define their own data needs.
Rockart, J. F. (1979) · PubMed · Cited by 2,802
The Fall and Rise of Strategic Planning
Mintzberg, H. (1994) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,773
Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders
Sabherwal, R., & Chan, Y. (2001) · Information systems research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.1.11.9714 · Cited by 1,319
Management strategies for information technology
(1990) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(90)90040-b · Cited by 1,045
Experiences in Strategic Information Systems Planning*
Earl, M. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249507 · Cited by 637
Premkumar, G. P., Ramamurthy, K., & Saunders, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045841 · Cited by 628
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 5, Iss. 2 [2013], Art. 4
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On being ‘Systematic’ in Literature Reviews in IS
Boell, S. K., & Ćećez-Kecmanović, D. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2014.26 · Cited by 552
Khosravi, P., & Ghapanchi, A. H. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.014 · Cited by 346
Self-citationThe implementation of artificial intelligence in organizations: A systematic literature review
Lee, M. C. M., Scheepers, H., Lui, A. K. H., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2023) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2023.103816 · Cited by 280
On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews
Boell, S. K., & Ćećez-Kecmanović, D. (2015) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137509888_3 · Cited by 191
Buyers' trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: a synthesizing literature review
Soleimani, M. (2022) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-021-00545-0 · Cited by 130
“It is important to add that the reasons behind selecting those top journals and conferences were IS journals’ available rankings (Fisher et al. 2007), previous SLR work (Tallon et al. 2019; Amrollahi et al. 2013), and their tendency for emphasis on e-commerce and related areas.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffith University, Amrollahi, A., Ghapanchi, A. H., Griffith University, Talaei-Khoei, A. T.-K., & University Technology Sydney
- Affiliations
- Griffith University (AU)
- Venue
- Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 39-66
- ISSN
- 1943-7536 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7544
- OpenAlex
- W6738442
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Pacific Asia journal of the Association for Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- strategic information systems planning, research trends, research gaps, business-IT alignment, information systems planning, research context, research methodology, information systems journals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
