The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cultural Competency: A Framework for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in the Archival Profession in the United States
Abstract
This article explores cultural competency in the context of the archival profession in the United States. The author reviews the cultural competency framework, the pertinent literature of archives, library, and information studies (LIS) and beyond, and surveys activity within the archival field. The author also connects cultural competency to archival principles and practice, and offers a call for further research to develop cultural competency within the profession. Cultural competency is offered as a framework for equity, diversity, and inclusion work that is accessible and available to all, and as one that provides a way forward particularly for dominant-culture archivists. Furthermore, archivists can contribute uniquely to the discourse on cultural competency within LIS; this article responds to the call for, and encourages more, discourse with LIS.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Today, the fields of museums, archives, and archaeology are influenced by practitioners advocating for cultural competency, collaboration, and data governance, striving to build stronger relationships with Tribal communities and foster more ethical and inclusive practices.
“Today, the fields of museums, archives, and archaeology are influenced by practitioners advocating for cultural competency, collaboration, and data governance, striving to build stronger relationships with Tribal communities, and fostering more ethical and inclusive practices (Autry Museum of the American West 2022; Engseth 2018; First Archivists Circle 2007; Global Digital Data Alliance 2019;”
From Building a Foundation: A Retrospective on NAGPRA Collections Compliance 1990–1995 (2025) · cites this paper as Engseth 2018
Citations
Cites
Trippin’ Over the Color Line: The Invisibility of Race in Library and Information Studies
Honma, T. (2005) · InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies · doi:10.5070/d412000540 · Cited by 187
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building a Foundation: A Retrospective on NAGPRA Collections Compliance 1990–1995
Sieg, L., & Neller, A. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.10097 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Engseth, E.
- Venue
- The American Archivist
- Publisher
- Society of American Archivists
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 460-482
- ISSN
- 0360-9081
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review