Building a Foundation: A Retrospective on NAGPRA Collections Compliance 1990–1995
Open accessAbstract
The passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) in 1990 ushered in a new era in museum and Tribal practices. Faced with new and unprecedented legislative mandates, early NAGPRA practitioners were challenged to put a set of principles and statutory language into practice. Museum and Tribal representatives faced numerous challenges and unexpected barriers to implement the law. In this retrospective, we discuss the reality of implementing NAGPRA between its passage and the inventory deadline in 1995, focusing on four areas: the law, professional archaeological and museological codes of ethics, the state of collections, and capacity to do the work. The substantial accomplishments of the first five years created a foundation for work that continues today. Parallels to contemporary NAGPRA implementation, especially under the 2024 regulations, include tight deadlines, requirements that were not previously contemplated by practitioners, and the changing understanding of what it means to comply with the law. Practitioners will get a better understanding and awareness of their NAGPRA obligations, practices that are respectful of Tribal practitioners’ time demands and priorities, appreciation for the technological capacities available today, the need to support for consultation partners, and the importance of taking time to build empathetic relationships., ResumenLa aprobación de la Ley de Protección y Repatriación de Tumbas de Nativos Americanos (NAGPRA) en 1990 marcó el comienzo de una nueva era en las prácticas museísticas y tribales. Ante nuevos mandatos legislativos sin precedentes, los primeros profesionales de la NAGPRA se vieron obligados a poner en práctica un conjunto de principios y un lenguaje legal. Los representantes de museos y tribus se enfrentaron a numerosos desafíos y obstáculos inesperados para implementar la ley. En esta retrospectiva, analizamos la realidad de la implementación de la NAGPRA entre su aprobación y la fecha límite del inventario en 1995, centrándonos en cuatro áreas: la ley, los códigos de ética profesional arqueológicos y museológicos, el estado de las colecciones y la capacidad para realizar el trabajo. Los importantes logros de los primeros cinco años sentaron las bases para un trabajo que continúa hoy en día. Los paralelismos con la implementación contemporánea de la NAGPRA, especialmente bajo las regulaciones de 2024, incluyen plazos ajustados, requisitos que antes no eran contemplados por los profesionales y la comprensión cambiante de lo que significa cumplir con la ley. Los profesionales adquirirán una mejor comprensión y conciencia de sus obligaciones en virtud de la NAGPRA, prácticas que respetan las demandas de tiempo y las prioridades de los profesionales tribales, una apreciación de las capacidades tecnológicas disponibles en la actualidad, la necesidad de apoyar a los socios de consulta y la importancia de tomarse el tiempo para construir relaciones empáticas.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This retrospective reviews how Tribes, museums, and federal agencies implemented NAGPRA between its 1990 passage and the 1995 inventory deadline, focusing on the law, ethics, collections, and capacity. It argues that early compliance work created a foundation for ongoing NAGPRA practice and offers parallels to implementation under the 2024 regulations.
Key findings
- By November 16, 1993, 525 museums and agencies had submitted summaries; over 100 more arrived within another year. By November 16, 1995, 599 museums and federal agencies had submitted inventories, and an additional 56 museums were granted extensions.
- Final NAGPRA regulations went into effect January 3, 1996, more than three years after the summary deadline and nearly two months after the inventory deadline; delays included a government-wide moratorium on new regulations, insufficient funding, ambiguities in the law, and lengthy draft reviews.
- Only four states—Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, and Nebraska—had reburial laws when NAGPRA passed, and few museums had policies on display or repatriation of human remains.
- Approximately $4.6 million was appropriated for consultation grants before the inventory deadline, far less than requested; initial Congressional Budget Office estimates for five-year federal compliance costs ranged from $20 to $55 million, which the authors describe as too conservative.
Methods
- Retrospective review of NAGPRA implementation from 1990 to 1995, organized around four areas: the law, professional archaeological and museological codes of ethics, the state of collections, and capacity to do the work.
- Draws on NAGPRA Review Committee minutes and reports to Congress, congressional reports, National Park Service guidance, professional ethics codes, and published literature.
- No original data were used; no permits were required for this work.
Limitations
- The paper states that no original data were used and that it relies on archival, committee, and published sources.
- The text makes evident that it remains unclear how many museums should have reported collections but did not, and that many federal agencies with large collections did not submit inventories by the deadline.
- The paper notes that early records were often incomplete, uncataloged, disorganized, or inaccessible, which limited what could be known about collections and compliance.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 101 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
By November 16, 1995, a total of 599 museums and federal agencies had submitted inventories.
“By November 16, 1995, a total of 599 museums and federal agencies had submitted inventories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The disposition of culturally unaffiliated human remains and associated funerary objects had yet to be addressed by the end of 1995.
“Additionally, the disposition of culturally unaffiliated human remains and associated funerary objects had yet to be addressed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
By November 16, 1993, 525 museums and agencies had submitted summaries.
“By November 16, 1993, 525 museums and agencies had submitted summaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Much published literature about the early years of NAGPRA focused on legal, epistemological, and ethical dimensions.
“Much of the published literature about the early years of NAGPRA focused on important legal, epistemological, and ethical dimensions of NAGPRA (e.g., Mihesuah 2000;Trope and Echo-Hawk 2000;Tsosie 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mihesuah 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Trope and Echo-Hawk 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Tsosie 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The early NAGPRA work of 1990-1995 created the foundation for ongoing NAGPRA efforts.
“We argue that this early work created the foundation for ongoing NAGPRA efforts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisereasoning
Less attention has been given to the substantial work on inventories and summaries accomplished to meet the deadlines and requirements established in NAGPRA.
“Less attention has been given to the substantial work on inventories and summaries that was accomplished to meet the deadlines and requirements established in the law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mihesuah 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Trope and Echo-Hawk 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Tsosie 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
A regional survey of collections across eight states by the US Army Corps of Engineers revealed significant shortcomings.
“For example, a regional survey of collections across eight states by the US Army Corps of Engineers revealed these significant shortcomings (Jelks 1989).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jelks 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
In 1993, after the Review Committee recommended that the Department Consulting Archaeologist provide interim guidance, a new document was created to assist with implementation of the Act, providing more details on inventories, summaries, and key terms.
“In 1993, after the Review Committee recommended that the Department Consulting Archaeologist (DCA) provide interim guidance to museums and agencies, a new document was created to assist with implementation of the Act.It provided more details on inventories, summaries, and key terms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The requirement to meet NAGPRA deadlines meant that practitioners had to submit whatever information they had, even if it had not been thoroughly checked or if there had not been sufficient opportunities for meaningful consultation.
“The requirement to meet deadlines meant that practitioners had to submit whatever information they had, even if it had not been thoroughly checked or if there had not been sufficient opportunities for meaningful consultation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Past collection practices have led to a substantial imbalance between the generation of collections and their long-term care and management.
“Past collection practices have led to a substantial imbalance between the generation of collections and their long-term care and management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The lack of regulations meant that NAGPRA practitioners had to rely on the law as the roadmap for the work.
“The lack of regulations meant that NAGPRA practitioners had to rely on the law as the roadmap for the work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Minutes of the 1992 and 1993 NAGPRA Review Committee reflect additional uncertainty over the determination of cultural affiliation.
“Minutes of the 1992 and 1993 Review Committee reflect additional uncertainty over the determination of cultural affiliation (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee minutes 1992b:7-12, 1993a:5-9, 13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee minutes 1992b:7-12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee minutes 1993a:5-9, 13
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Some museums and state institutions had policies that legally restricted the ability to deaccession collections.
“In fact, some museums and state institutions had policies that legally restricted the ability to deaccession collections, a problem that was discussed at the very first meeting of the NAGPRA Review Committee (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992a:13).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992a:13
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
The NAGPRA legislation recognized the rights of Native Americans to the remains of their Ancestors, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony.
“First, the law recognized the rights of Native Americans to the remains of their Ancestors, funerary objects, sacred objects, and objects of cultural patrimony.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
The sheer volume of existing collections, many in poor condition, combined with the constant influx of new materials, has led to a significant backlog of cataloging and housing.
“The sheer volume of existing collections-many of which are in poor condition-combined with the constant influx of new materials has led to a significant backlog of cataloging and housing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The passage of NAGPRA forced museums to rethink their focus on scholarship and fiduciary trust.
“The passage of NAGPRA forced museums to rethink their focus on scholarship and fiduciary trust, issues that quickly came before the NAGPRA Review Committee (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1993a:4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993a:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
NAGPRA required promulgations of regulations by November 16, 1991.
“NAGPRA required promulgations of regulations by November 16, 1991.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
NAGPRA introduced a new requirement to museum and collections work: consultation.
“It also introduced a new requirement to museum and collections work: consultation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In 1986, the SAA addressed how archaeologists should handle human remains in response to repatriation legislation debated by Congress and the growing movement among Tribes to reclaim control over ancestral remains.
“In 1986, the SAA addressed the sensitive issue of how archaeologists should handle human remains in response to repatriation legislation that was being debated by Congress and the growing movement among Tribes to reclaim control over ancestral remains (Lovis et al. 2004;McKeown 2012;Riding In 2000;SAA 1986).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lovis et al. 2004 source
- cites McKeown 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Riding In 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
From the late 1800s to the 1920s, there was a concerted and systematic effort to collect Native American artifacts.
“From the late 1800s to the 1920s, there was a concerted and systematic effort to collect Native American artifacts, fueled by the belief that Native cultures were disappearing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
When NAGPRA was passed, many museums and federal agencies faced daunting challenges in producing summaries and inventories due to the curation crisis.
“When NAGPRA was passed, many museums and federal agencies faced daunting challenges in producing summaries and inventories due to the curation crisis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Each museum, agency, and Tribe could interpret NAGPRA differently.
“Each museum, agency, and Tribe could interpret the law differently (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992c:12, 1995a:5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992c:12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995a:5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Without regulations, binding court decisions, or precedents, NAGPRA practitioners had a limited basis on which to understand and comply with the law.
“Without regulations in place, binding court decisions interpreting the law, or precedents, NAGPRA practitioners had a limited basis on which to understand and comply with the law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Only one new staff member, the Program Lead, was added.
“Only one new staff member, the Program Lead, was added.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
NAGPRA mandated that museums share records related to summaries and inventories when requested by Tribes.
“The law also mandated that museums share records related to summaries and inventories when requested by Tribes (25USC32 §3003(b)(2) and §3004(b)(2)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites 25USC32 §3003(b)(2)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites §3004(b)(2)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
There was a deep concern about ensuring the work was done correctly, particularly in avoiding repatriation to the wrong groups.
“There was a deep concern about ensuring the work was done correctly, particularly in avoiding repatriation to the wrong groups (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1994b:6, 1995b:6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994b:6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995b:6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationnone given
The cataloging done during the creation of inventories and summaries established a baseline for understanding the scope of collections and identifying human remains or cultural materials that may fall under NAGPRA.
“The cataloging done during the creation of inventories and summaries established a baseline for understanding the scope of collections and identifying human remains or cultural materials that may fall under NAGPRA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many Tribes developed their own processes for tracking, organizing, and prioritizing their NAGPRA-related work.
“Many Tribes developed their own processes for tracking, organizing, and prioritizing their NAGPRA-related work (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The early years of NAGPRA implementation exposed the critical need for additional resources and systems to support the involved parties.
“From struggling to track collections in nonfederal repositories to facing emotional and logistical burdens during consultations, the early years of NAGPRA implementation exposed the critical need for additional resources and systems to support the involved parties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Museums lacked the information needed to identify lineal descendants.
“Museums also lacked the information needed to identify lineal descendants (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992b:3, 1993c:3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992b:3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993c:3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Even when NAGPRA was being drafted, there was no accurate count of the number of Native American human remains held by museums and agencies, with estimates ranging from tens of thousands to over one million individuals.
“This problem was evident even when NAGPRA was being drafted-there was no accurate count of the number of Native American human remains held by museums and agencies, with estimates ranging from tens of thousands to over one million individuals (Congressional Budget Office estimates and caveats provided in Harjo 1989;Harris 1991:195-196n3;Spotted Elk 1989;Trope and Echo-Hawk 1992:39; US House of Rep”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Harjo 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Harris 1991:195-196n3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Spotted Elk 1989
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Not long after NAGPRA was passed, concerns were raised about an agency's ability to track the locations of its collections.
“Not long after NAGPRA was passed, concerns were raised about an agency's ability to track the locations of its collections (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992b:12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992b:12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
NAGPRA required museums and federal agencies to account for their Native American collections.
“They were now required to account for their Native American collections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Federal agencies faced significant challenges in completing summaries and inventories.
“Federal agencies faced significant challenges in completing summaries and inventories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Museums faced significant capacity issues related to staff, funding, time, expertise, and institutional support.
“Museums faced significant capacity issues related to staff, funding, time, expertise, and institutional support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The summaries and inventories submitted to the DCA varied greatly in terminology, content, and format.
“The summaries and inventories submitted to the DCA varied greatly in terminology, content, and format.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Without such catalogs, museums and federal agencies were often unaware of the collections under their care.
“Without such catalogs, museums and federal agencies were often unaware of the collections under their care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Electronic versions of the documents were difficult to use owing to the different systems employed by museums.
“Electronic versions of the documents were difficult to use owing to the different systems employed by museums (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992c:6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992c:6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Many nonfederal repositories cataloged collections using their own terminology and systems, which further complicated the identification of federal agency collections.
“Many of the nonfederal repositories cataloged collections using their own terminology and systems, which further complicated the identification of federal agency collections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The creation of databases proved to be a significant challenge.
“The creation of databases proved to be a significant challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
There was no Tribal directory for repatriation officials and traditional religious leaders.
“There was no Tribal directory for repatriation officials and traditional religious leaders (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1993a:4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993a:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Tribes began to engage more widely with museums and federal agencies to discuss collections.
“Tribes began to engage more widely with museums and federal agencies to discuss collections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The lack of financial and staff resources was the primary reason museums were unable to complete inventories by 1995.
“The lack of financial and staff resources was the primary reason museums were unable to complete inventories by 1995 (NAGPRA Review Committee 1996b:22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1996b:22
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Permits allowed collections to be housed in repositories outside the agency's control.
“These permits allowed collections to be housed in repositories outside the agency's control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Many archaeological collections were housed in nonagency repositories, in accordance with permits issued for excavations on federal lands.
“They lacked dedicated staff and funding (Government Accountability Office 2010:17), and many archaeological collections were housed in nonagency repositories, in accordance with the permits issued for excavations on federal lands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The 2024 regulations aimed to resolve this problem by requiring museums to contact federal agencies for collections housed in their repositories and report these collections to National NAGPRA.
“The 2024 regulations (DOI 2024) aimed to resolve this problem by requiring museums to contact federal agencies for collections housed in their repositories and report these collections to National NAGPRA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DOI 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Another pressing issue was the lack of complete, accurate, and accessible catalogs that used standardized terminology and were vetted by qualified personnel.
“Another pressing issue was the lack of complete, accurate, and accessible catalogs that used standardized terminology and were vetted by qualified personnel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
The implementation of NAGPRA brought significant challenges for federal agencies, museums, and Tribes.
“The implementation of NAGPRA brought forth significant challenges for various stakeholders, including federal agencies, museums, and Tribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Despite limited resources, the DCA and AAD moved quickly to begin establishing the framework for NAGPRA implementation.
“Despite these limited resources, the DCA and AAD moved quickly to begin establishing the framework for NAGPRA implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 48
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- May combine two claims. 74
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenAnother 15 years passed before disposition regulations were finalized.
“Another 15 years passed before they were finalized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone givenAn additional 56 museums were granted extensions for inventories.
“An additional 56 museums were granted extensions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationMany federal agencies with large collections did not submit inventories by the deadline, a fact realized by the Review Committee and later detailed in a Government Accountability Office report.
“Additionally, there were many federal agencies with large collections that did not submit inventories by the deadline, a fact that was quickly realized by the Review Committee (NAGPRA Review Committee 1996a) and later detailed in a Government Accountability Office (2010) report.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1996a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Government Accountability Office 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe final NAGPRA regulations went into effect on January 3, 1996, more than three years after the summary deadline and nearly two months after the inventory deadline.
“After much discussion, public comment, and revision, the final regulations (DOI 1995) went into effect on January 3, 1996, more than three years after the deadline for summaries (November 16, 1993) and nearly two months after the deadline for inventories (November 16, 1995;McKeown 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites DOI 1995
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites McKeown 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationOver 100 more summaries were received within another year; some may have been completed by the deadline but not provided to the DOI because it was not required by law.
“Over 100 more were received within another year; some may have been completed by the deadline but not provided to the DOI because it was not required by law (Chari and Lavallee 2013:10; NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Chari and Lavallee 2013:10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe 1993 guidance was distributed to more than 1,200 museums, federal agencies, and Tribes.
“The guidance was distributed to more than 1,200 museums, federal agencies, and Tribes (NAGPRA Review Committee 1993b:5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993b:5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningA lack of funding presented a barrier to NAGPRA implementation.
“a lack of funding presented a barrier to implementation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNAGPRA required significant expenditures by museums, federal agencies, and Tribes.
“NAGPRA required significant expenditures by museums, federal agencies, and Tribes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe expenses of NAGPRA were numerous and included staff.
“The expenses were numerous and included staff”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThere are striking parallels between the early years of NAGPRA work and ongoing work under the 2024 regulations, including tight deadlines, requirements not previously contemplated by practitioners, and a changing understanding of what it means to comply with the law.
“There are striking parallels between the early years of NAGPRA work and ongoing work under the 2024 regulations (Department of the Interior [DOI] 2024), such as tight deadlines, requirements that were not previously contemplated by practitioners, and the changing understanding of what it means to comply with the law.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Department of the Interior [DOI] 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 was a radical break from the status quo in archaeological and museum practices, introducing new legal responsibilities for the identification and repatriation of Native American Ancestors and cultural items.
“The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA; United States Code 1990) was a radical break from the status quo in archaeological and museum practices, introducing a new set of legal responsibilities for the identification and repatriation of Native American Ancestors and cultural items.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites United States Code 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe statutory deadlines necessitated that solutions be developed quickly.
“The statutory deadlines necessitated that solutions be developed quickly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe professional standards, capacity to do the work, and state of collections were not aligned with NAGPRA, creating numerous challenges and unexpected barriers for the first generation of practitioners implementing the law.
“The professional standards, capacity to do the work, and state of collections were not aligned with NAGPRA, creating numerous challenges and unexpected barriers as the first generation of practitioners worked to implement this new law.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe early work included inventories and summaries and the cataloging they required, work with professional codes that needed updating, capacity-building in staff, funding, and processes, and opening dialogue between museums, federal agencies, and Tribes.
“These include the inventories and summaries that were generated and the cataloging of collections and records that they required; working with professional codes that needed updating to reflect a new responsibility and work ethic; capacity-building in terms of staff, funding, and processes; and the opening of a dialogue between museums, federal agencies, and Tribes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the 1990s, museum ethics were deeply rooted in a commitment to public service, with institutions focused on collecting, preserving, and interpreting the world's diverse cultural and natural heritage.
“In the 1990s, museum ethics were deeply rooted in a commitment to public service, with institutions focused on collecting, preserving, and interpreting the world's diverse cultural and natural heritage (American Association of Museums 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites American Association of Museums 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReasons for the delay in NAGPRA regulations included a government-wide moratorium on new regulations, insufficient funding, ambiguities in the law, and lengthy draft reviews.
“Minutes of the NAGPRA Review Committee provide information on reasons for the delay, including a government-wide moratorium on new regulations, insufficient funding, ambiguities in the law, and lengthy draft reviews (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1992a:3, 1995a:5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992a:3
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995a:5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenIt remains unclear how many museums should have reported collections but did not.
“However, it remains unclear how many museums should have reported collections but did not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Society for American Archaeology established ethical guidelines in 1961 addressing methods, ethics, and training in archaeology.
“The Society for American Archaeology (SAA) established ethical guidelines in 1961 to address key issues in the field, including methods, ethics, and training in archaeology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Society for American Archaeology [SAA] 1961
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe deadline for NAGPRA regulations proved impracticable because the regulations could not be completed without participation by the NAGPRA Review Committee, yet funds to establish the committee were not available until October 1991.
“The deadline proved impracticable, because the regulations could not be completed without participation by the NAGPRA Review Committee, yet funds to establish the committee were not available until October 1991.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 1991, the SAA initiated a review of its guidelines, leading to the creation of the SAA Principles of Archaeological Ethics in 1996.
“In 1991, the SAA initiated a review of these guidelines, leading to the creation of the SAA Principles of Archaeological Ethics in 1996.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SAA 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOlder collections continue to suffer from neglect, underscoring the need for a more balanced and comprehensive approach to collections care.
“Older collections, in particular, continue to suffer from neglect, underscoring the need for a more balanced and comprehensive approach to collections care (e.g., Trimble and Marino 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trimble and Marino 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite 36 CFR 79, many institutions housing archaeological collections failed to meet even minimum guidelines, grappling with inadequate facilities, lack of security, insufficient staff, and poorly tracked or inaccessible collections.
“However, despite these efforts, many institutions housing archaeological collections failed to meet even these minimum guidelines, grappling with challenges such as inadequate facilities, lack of security, insufficient staff, and poorly tracked or inaccessible collections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Trimble and Marino 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIt was expected that more consultation, work, and time would lead to the identification of more cultural affiliations.
“It was expected that more consultation, work, and time would lead to the identification of more cultural affiliations (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1995c:3-6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995c:3-6
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe implementation work of the early 1990s demonstrates that the work can get done, although it often has its own timeline not anticipated by the law or regulations.
“The implementation work of the early 1990s provides a framework for solving these problems by demonstrating that the work can get done, although it often has its own timeline that is not anticipated by the law or regulations;”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 2000, the American Association of Museums revised its code of ethics, incorporating changes primarily related to human remains, funerary objects, sacred items, and the growing number of competing ownership claims.
“In 2000, the American Association of Museums revised its code of ethics, incorporating changes primarily related to human remains, funerary objects, sacred items, and the growing number of competing ownership claims (American Association of Museums 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites American Association of Museums 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOnly four states (Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, and Nebraska) had reburial laws, and just a small number of museums had policies regarding the display or repatriation of human remains.
“Only four states (Arizona, Hawaii, Kansas, and Nebraska) had reburial laws (Trope and Echo-Hawk 1992:53), and just a small number of museums had policies regarding the display or repatriation of human remains (Boyd and Haas 1992:253).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Trope and Echo-Hawk 1992:53
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Boyd and Haas 1992:253
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere was a long-standing presumption that museums had rightful ownership of their collections, and stewardship was viewed as a profound public trust focused on preservation, documentation, and accessibility.
“There was a long-standing presumption that museums had rightful ownership of their collections.The stewardship of those collections was viewed as a profound public trust, with management of them focused on preservation, documentation, and accessibility that aligned with the institution's mission and public responsibilities (American Association of Museums 1984).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites American Association of Museums 1984
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAs repatriation efforts progress, a significant challenge remains in reconciling past practices with contemporary ethical standards.
“As repatriation efforts progress, a significant challenge remains in reconciling past practices with contemporary ethical standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCatalogs and accession records are frequently lacking in detail, and their contents are not always properly transcribed into working catalogs.
“Catalogs and accession records are frequently lacking in detail, and their contents are not always properly transcribed into working catalogs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe updated AAM code emphasized that decisions regarding sensitive matters should be handled with openness, seriousness, and respect for the dignity of all parties, and acknowledged the special nature of human remains and sacred objects.
“The updated code emphasized that decisions regarding these sensitive matters should be handled with openness, seriousness, and respect for the dignity of all parties.Acknowledging the special nature of human remains and sacred objects in decisions became important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites American Association of Museums 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe varying interpretations of NAGPRA underscored the need for regulations that provided clear, consistent guidelines and a common understanding of the law to prevent frustration, confusion, and misunderstandings that would undermine trust.
“The varying interpretations of the law underscored the need for a set of regulations that provided clear, consistent guidelines and a common understanding of the law to prevent frustration, confusion, and misunderstandings that would undermine trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAnother important measure of NAGPRA's early accomplishments lies in stories of successful repatriations, with numerous examples in newspaper articles, conference presentations, and scholarly publications.
“Another important measure of NAGPRA's early accomplishments lies in the stories of successful repatriations.Newspaper articles, conference presentations, and scholarly publications provide numerous examples of these successes and the progress made under the Act (e.g., Robbins 1999;West et al. 2000;Yellowman 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Robbins 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites West et al. 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Yellowman 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNAGPRA compliance heavily depends on context, but this information is often difficult to trace within museum records.
“NAGPRA compliance heavily depends on context, but this information is often difficult to trace within museum records.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Documentation regarding an object's history plays a significant role in understanding context.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIn 1990, the DOI published 36 CFR 79, which outlined necessary standards for curation.
“In 1990, the DOI published 36 CFR 79, “Curation of Federally Owned and Administered Archeological Collections, ” which outlined necessary standards for curation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe development of relationships is key to successful NAGPRA compliance, as well as successful museum and curation work in general.
“and that the development of relationships is key to successful NAGPRA compliance, as well as successful museum and curation work in general.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIntense global competition among national, regional, and university museums led to an increase in the collection of materials from Indigenous communities.
“Intense global competition among national, regional, and university museums of anthropology and natural history led to an increase in the collection of materials from Indigenous communities (Krech 1999;Sturtevant 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Krech 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sturtevant 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany institutions lack the personnel, space, and resources to properly care for collections in perpetuity, putting preservation and access at risk.
“Many institutions lack the personnel, space, and resources to properly care for these collections “in perpetuity, ” putting preservation and access at risk (Childs 2004:v).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Childs 2004:v
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe preliminary guidance included discussion of key terms related to inventories and summaries, and these definitions were reiterated in a publication and used in the initial draft of the regulations.
“The guidance included discussion of key terms related to inventories and summaries (Table 1).The definitions of these terms were reiterated in a publication in the Arizona State Law Review (McManamon and Nordby 1992) and used in the initial draft of the regulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McManamon and Nordby 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Review Committee advocated an approach to first reduce the number of human remains and associated funerary objects on the culturally unaffiliated list and proposed a disposition process centered on regional consortia of Tribes, but regulations for disposition were reserved for future promulgation when final regulations were published in December 1995.
“The Review Committee advocated an approach that would first seek to reduce the number of human remains and associated funerary objects that were included on the culturally unaffiliated list.They proposed a disposition process that was centered on regional consortia of Tribes (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1995b:9-10, 1995c:9), but regulations for disposition were reserved for future promulgation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995b:9-10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995c:9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe 1986 SAA statement advocated determination of cultural affiliation based on evidence rather than assertions, and repatriation evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
“The statement advocated for a determination of cultural affiliation based on evidence rather than assertions, ensuring decisions are grounded in facts.Repatriation should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the varying levels of information available and the unique relationships contemporary Tribes have with the remains (SAA 1986).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SAA 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenArchaeology has placed significant emphasis on excavation, often at the expense of utilizing existing collections for scientific and educational purposes.
“Additionally, archaeology has placed significant emphasis on excavation, often at the expense of utilizing existing collections for scientific and educational purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SAA revisions emphasize collaboration, transparency, and respect for Indigenous and descendant communities, and highlight ethical conduct, collaborative spirit, and cultural respect that archaeologists must uphold.
“These revisions emphasize the importance of collaboration, transparency, and respect for Indigenous and descendant communities, and highlight the ethical conduct, collaborative spirit, and cultural respect that archaeologists must uphold in their work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites SAA 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites SAA 2024
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEconomic challenges faced by Tribal groups frequently led to the sale of cultural items as a means of income.
“Economic challenges faced by Tribal groups frequently led to the sale of cultural items as a means of income (Krech 1999;Sturtevant 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Krech 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Sturtevant 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe SAA revisions are grounded in ideal values and behaviors that all SAA members should aspire to, reflecting the collective voice of the membership.
“These revisions are grounded in ideal values and behaviors that all SAA members should aspire to, reflecting the collective voice of the membership.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPeople can build the capacity for NAGPRA work, especially if given resources.
“that people can build the capacity for work, especially if given resources;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe 1986 SAA statement recognized ongoing direct communication between all stakeholders as crucial for fostering trust and mutual understanding, and dialogue promotes greater respect for differing viewpoints.
“The statement recognized that ongoing, direct communication between all stakeholders was crucial for fostering trust and mutual understanding.While agreement may not always be reached, such dialogue promotes greater respect for differing viewpoints (SAA 1986).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SAA 1986
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNumerous studies and publications have underscored the ongoing nature of the curation crisis, highlighting the consequences of inadequate curation and management of collections.
“Numerous studies and publications have underscored the ongoing nature of this curation crisis, highlighting the consequences of inadequate curation and management of collections (Childs and Sullivan 2004;Ford 1977;General Accounting Office 1987;Lindsay et al. 1979Lindsay et al. , 1980;;Marquardt 1977Marquardt , 2004;;Marquardt et al. 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Childs and Sullivan 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Ford 1977
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites General Accounting Office 1987
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe 1996 SAA principles focused on stewardship, accountability, preventing commercialization, public education, respecting intellectual property, reporting and publication, and preservation of archaeological records, with the overarching goal to protect the archaeological record rather than building relationships with descendant communities.
“This updated framework focused on the responsibility of stewardship, stressing the importance of accountability, preventing commercialization, promoting public education and outreach, respecting intellectual property, ensuring proper reporting and publication, and maintaining the preservation of archaeological records.The overarching goal was to protect the archaeological record rather than”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SAA 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe NAGPRA statute provided definitions for most terms and laid out a stepwise process for summaries and inventories.
“The statute provided definitions for most terms, and laid out a process for summaries and inventories in a stepwise progression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhen NAGPRA was passed, there was no federal precedent and few state or institutional precedents.
“When NAGPRA was passed, there was no federal precedent and few state or institutional precedents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationNonetheless, museums, agencies, and Tribes worked in good faith to complete required summaries and inventories, publish notices, and begin repatriations.
“Nonetheless, they worked in good faith to complete the required summaries and inventories, publish notices, and begin repatriations (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1993b, 1995a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1995a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLike museums, the practice of archaeology is shaped by societal values, necessitating continuous review and revision of archaeological ethics.
“Like museums, the practice of archaeology is shaped by societal values, necessitating continuous review and revision of archaeological ethics to ensure they reflect these evolving values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere was a lack of awareness among federal agencies about what they owned and where it was located, an absence of adequate inventories in museums, and an urgent need for agencies and museums to act quickly to comply with NAGPRA.
“There was a lack of awareness among federal agencies about what they owned and where it was located, an absence of adequate inventories in museums, and an urgent need for agencies and museums to act quickly to address these shortcomings in order to comply with NAGPRA (Childs and Sullivan 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Childs and Sullivan 2004
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationToday, the fields of museums, archives, and archaeology are influenced by practitioners advocating for cultural competency, collaboration, and data governance, striving to build stronger relationships with Tribal communities and foster more ethical and inclusive practices.
“Today, the fields of museums, archives, and archaeology are influenced by practitioners advocating for cultural competency, collaboration, and data governance, striving to build stronger relationships with Tribal communities, and fostering more ethical and inclusive practices (Autry Museum of the American West 2022; Engseth 2018; First Archivists Circle 2007; Global Digital Data Alliance 2019;”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Autry Museum of the American West 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Engseth 2018 source
- cites First Archivists Circle 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationConsideration of the voices and needs of the communities from which objects originated, ranging from Indigenous groups to other ethnic, religious, and community groups, was regarded.
“Consideration of the voices and needs of the communities from which these objects originated-ranging from Indigenous groups to other ethnic, religious, and community groups-was regarded (Association of Registrars and Collections Specialists 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Association of Registrars and Collections Specialists 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe integration of Indigenous perspectives and a strong emphasis on cultural sensitivity are reshaping museum and archaeological practice, signaling a transformative era.
“The integration of Indigenous perspectives and a strong emphasis on cultural sensitivity are reshaping museum and archaeological practice.These changes signal a transformative era, where ethical stewardship encourages deeper community engagement and healing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe House report attributed the presence of Native American human remains and funerary objects in museums to looting of burial sites and the Army Surgeon General's 1868 order for collection of Native American skeletons for scientific inquiry, suggesting the House intended to address repatriation of human remains removed from burial sites, recent graves, or during military actions.
“The background section of the House report (US House of Representatives 1990) attributed the presence of Native American human remains and funerary objects in museums to the looting of Native American burial sites and the Army Surgeon General's 1868 order for the collection of Native American skeletons for scientific inquiry (Bieder 1990;Juzda 2009), suggesting that the House intended to address”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites US House of Representatives 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Bieder 1990
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Juzda 2009
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe consultation process demonstrated the critical importance of relationship-building, which requires time and transparent communication, and cannot be rushed or based on incomplete information.
“Furthermore, the consultation process demonstrated the critical importance of relationship-building, which requires time and transparent communication, and cannot be rushed or based on incomplete information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMuseums play a role in society grounded in the values society holds, and those values are reflected in museum ethics in curation, preservation, public programming, and education.
“Museums play a role in society that is grounded in the values that society holds.Those values are reflected in the ethics of museum organization and practice in the areas of curation, preservation, public programing, and education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe evolution of ethical standards for museums reflects shifting societal values and the growing complexity of museum operations.
“The evolution of ethical standards for museums reflects shifting societal values and the growing complexity of museum operations (see Table 2 for a comparison of ethical codes).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe actions of collectors and dealers alienated valuable cultural material from Native communities, stripping items of their original cultural context and often depriving Tribes of their heritage.
“The actions of collectors and dealers during this period alienated much of the valuable cultural material from Native communities, stripping these items of their original cultural context and often depriving Tribes of their heritage (Krech 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Krech 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile a great deal was accomplished by early NAGPRA practitioners, difficulties remained unresolved by the end of 1995, including lack of adequate support and how to include Tribes without federal recognition.
“While a great deal was accomplished by the early NAGPRA practitioners, there were difficulties that had not been resolved by the end of 1995.Many of these continue to present barriers to implementation, such as a lack of adequate support and how to include Tribes without federal recognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataProgram staff compiled a list of culturally unidentified human remains and associated funerary objects for the Review Committee and began developing a database of summaries and inventories.
“Additionally, they compiled a list of culturally unidentified human remains and associated funerary objects for the Review Committee and began developing a database of summaries and inventories to support the committee's work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe collections care necessitated by NAGPRA marked a significant leap forward and laid the foundation for the work that continues today.
“As imperfect as it may have been, the collections care necessitated by NAGPRA marked a significant leap forward and laid the foundation for the work that continues today.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe inventories and summaries generated through this process brought greater transparency and accountability to institutions, offering some long-awaited answers to Tribes seeking to locate their Ancestors and cultural items.
“The inventories and summaries generated through this process brought greater transparency and accountability to institutions, offering some long-awaited answers to Tribes seeking to locate their Ancestors and cultural items.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningLocating collections was crucial, as agencies were responsible for NAGPRA compliance regardless of where their collections were housed.
“However, locating these collections was crucial, as agencies were responsible for NAGPRA compliance regardless of where their collections were housed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe AAD received a large volume of documents, most of which were in paper form.
“The AAD received a large volume of documents, most of which were in paper form (NAGPRA Review Committee 1996b:17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1996b:17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIt was not until 2000 that additional staff were added to the program, adding significantly to the capacity of what is now known as the National NAGPRA Program.
“It was not until 2000 that additional staff were added to the program, adding significantly to the capacity of what is now known as the National NAGPRA Program (see Government Accountability Office [2010:12-13] for an overview of the office's history).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Government Accountability Office [2010:12-13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFor Tribes visiting collections, the lack of knowledge about what was held created risks, as proper protocols could not be followed.
“For Tribes visiting collections, the lack of knowledge about what was held in these collections created risks, as proper protocols could not be followed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenProgram staff reviewed submitted summaries to ensure museums were contacting the appropriate Tribes.
“The program staff reviewed submitted summaries to ensure museums were contacting the appropriate Tribes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTribes were confronted with curation and collections management practices they found disrespectful and hurtful, adding further difficulty to collection reviews.
“Tribes were confronted with curation and collections management practices that they found disrespectful and hurtful, adding further difficulty to the already challenging process of conducting collection reviews (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1994b:16).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994b:16
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe DCA and NAGPRA program lead created guidance and sample documents, compiled a list of 759 Tribal officials, sent notifications to over 15,000 museums, published notices, and implemented a grant program when Congress appropriated funding in fiscal year 1994.
“The DCA and NAGPRA program lead worked to create guidance and sample documents, compiled a list of 759 Tribal officials (few of whom were cultural heritage or cultural resource officials), sent notifications to over 15,000 museums, published notices, and, when Congress appropriated funding in fiscal year 1994, implemented a grant program (NAGPRA Review Committee 1993c:4, 1994a:4, 1994c:4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993c:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994c:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCongress assigned responsibility for NAGPRA to the Secretary of the Interior, who delegated most of the duties to the AAD, particularly the DCA.
“Congress assigned responsibility for NAGPRA to the Secretary of the Interior, who delegated most of the duties to the AAD, particularly the DCA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMuseums had to subscribe to the register to receive hard copies or locate them in a subscribing library, because the Federal Register was not readily available online.
“museums had to subscribe to the register to receive hard copies or locate them in a subscribing library, because the Federal Register was not readily available online.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenEarly practitioners learned that even when information seemed limited, closer examination and good collaboration often revealed that much more could be learned about an item.
“Early practitioners also learned that, even when information seemed limited, a closer examination and good collaboration often revealed that much more could be learned about an item.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAs there were no precedents for this work, museums requested sample documents and training.
“As there were no precedents for this work, museums requested sample documents and training (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992b:12, 1994a:8-9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992b:12
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:8-9
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe identification and cataloging of records provided a means of connecting them to the corresponding collections.
“The identification and cataloging of records provided a means of connecting them to the corresponding collections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningTribes were provided with incomplete information, and universities often failed to recognize that human remains and cultural items could be curated outside of anthropology departments.
“Tribes were provided with incomplete information, and universities often failed to recognize that human remains and cultural items could be curated outside of anthropology departments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile federal agencies did submit summaries and inventories by the deadline, many were incomplete or lacked adequate consultation.
“While federal agencies did submit summaries and inventories by the deadline, many were incomplete or lacked adequate consultation (Government Accountability Office 2010:18-22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Government Accountability Office 2010:18-22
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationInadequate records, uncataloged or poorly documented collections, and the long history of collecting all created challenges in understanding the collections.
“Inadequate records, uncataloged or poorly documented collections, and the long history of collecting all created challenges in understanding the collections (e.g., Ambler and Goff 2013:202-203;Goff 2019:28).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ambler and Goff 2013:202-203
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Goff 2019:28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDespite obstacles, NAGPRA prompted meaningful progress toward the respectful repatriation and stewardship of Native American ancestral remains and cultural heritage.
“Despite these obstacles, the law prompted meaningful progress toward the respectful repatriation and stewardship of Native American ancestral remains and cultural heritage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lack of digitized or online information created barriers to information-sharing, limited museums' ability to reunite records with human remains and cultural items, and prevented the identification of related documentation in other repositories.
“This created barriers to information-sharing, limited museums' ability to reunite records with human remains and cultural items, and prevented the identification of related documentation in other repositories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenOnly some of the materials in the collections had specific Tribal identification in museum records, and many of those identifications were made by third parties whose expertise was unclear.
“Only some of the materials in the collections had specific Tribal identification in museum records, and many of those identifications were made by third parties whose expertise was unclear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAccurate inventory work requires that collections be physically viewed or checked in person; records cannot always be relied upon, especially for collections that did not have adequate curation.
“Accurate inventory work requires that collections be physically viewed or checked in person; records cannot always be relied upon, especially for collections that did not have adequate curation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWhile museums understood their mission and public trust responsibilities, many were cautious about identifying cultural items and affiliations.
“While museums understood their mission and public trust responsibilities, many were cautious about identifying cultural items and affiliations (e.g., NAGPRA Review Committee 1993a:4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1993a:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningResponsibilities were often delegated to staff members or graduate students who already had other duties and may have lacked the necessary background to identify items or determine the appropriate Tribes to consult.
“Often, responsibilities were delegated to staff members or graduate students who already had other duties and may have lacked the necessary background to identify items or determine the appropriate Tribes to consult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenResponsibility for NAGPRA was assigned to the Secretary of the Interior and largely delegated to the Archaeological Assistance Division.
“Assigned to the Secretary of the Interior, the responsibility for NAGPRA was largely delegated to the Archaeological Assistance Division (AAD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenNo original data were used in this research.
“No original data were used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningNAGPRA served as an important wake-up call for museums and federal agencies.
“NAGPRA served as an important wake-up call for museums and federal agencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe DCA and AAD offered workshops in conjunction with annual professional association meetings and hosted a three-day training at the University of Nevada.
“They also offered workshops in conjunction with annual professional association meetings and hosted a three-day training at the University of Nevada (NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1994a:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenInstitutional support for NAGPRA work was limited, with small budgets, little administrative assistance, and low prioritization by management.
“Institutional support for the work was limited, with small budgets, little administrative assistance, and low prioritization by management.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNAGPRA's mandates required museums, federal agencies, and Tribes to create inventories, conduct consultations, and facilitate repatriations of cultural items and human remains.
“The law's mandates required museums, federal agencies, and Tribes to create inventories, conduct consultations, and facilitate repatriations of cultural items and human remains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenNAGPRA tasks were complicated by inadequate funding, lack of staff, limited training, and technological limitations.
“However, these tasks were complicated by inadequate funding, lack of staff, limited training, and technological limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe only available listing of Tribes was the Bureau of Indian Affairs list, which was not published in the Federal Register until 1995.
“The only available listing of Tribes was the Bureau of Indian Affairs list, which was not published in the Federal Register until 1995.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationImproved standards for collections care, along with greater sensitivity to Tribal guidelines, enhanced stewardship.
“Improved standards for collections care, along with greater sensitivity to Tribal guidelines, enhanced stewardship (Sullivan 1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sullivan 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Review Committee immediately recognized this problem, which persisted for decades.
“The Review Committee immediately recognized this problem (NAGPRA Review Committee 1996a:4), which persisted for decades (see GAO [2010] for a review of federal agency efforts up to 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1996a:4
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites GAO [2010]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDocumentation related to summaries and inventories was often uncataloged, lacked proper finding aids, was disorganized and not readily accessible, or was housed within the same facility as the collections.
“However, such documentation was often uncataloged, lacked proper finding aids, was disorganized and not readily accessible, or even housed within the same facility as the collections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWithin 18 months, the DCA and AAD created a charter for the Review Committee, appointed its members, issued early guidance on how to interpret the law, hired a program lead, and began drafting regulations.
“Within 18 months, they created a charter for the Review Committee, appointed its members, issued early guidance on how to interpret the law, hired a program lead, and began drafting regulations (NAGPRA Review Committee 1992a:2-5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NAGPRA Review Committee 1992a:2-5
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFederal agencies lacked dedicated staff and funding.
“They lacked dedicated staff and funding (Government Accountability Office 2010:17), and many archaeological collections were housed in nonagency repositories, in accordance with the permits issued for excavations on federal lands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Government Accountability Office 2010:17
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAt the time of NAGPRA, none of this information was digitized or available online.
“Technology was woefully inadequate at that time: none of this information was digitized or available online.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Documentation regarding an object's history plays a significant role in understanding context.
“Documentation regarding an object's history plays a significant role in understanding context.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Interval after the summary deadline is overstated
MinorJanuary 3, 1996 was about two years and seven weeks after November 16, 1993, not more than three years later.
“more than three years after the deadline for summaries (November 16, 1993)”
“the final regulations (DOI 1995) went into effect on January 3, 1996”
Cites
Plundered Skulls and Stolen Spirits
Colwell, C. (2016) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226299044.001.0001 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Repatriation at the Pueblo of Zuni: Diverse Solutions to Complex Problems
Ferguson, T. J., Anyon, R., & Ladd, E. J. (1996) · The American Indian Quarterly · doi:10.2307/1185704 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Resolving the Crisis in Archaeological Collections Curation
Marquardt, W. H., Montet-White, A. M., & Scholtz, S. C. (1982) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0002731600061308 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Four Statements for Archaeology
(1961) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/s0002731600029322 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Engseth, E. (2018) · The American Archivist · doi:10.17723/0360-9081-81.2.460 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Smith, E. J. (2009) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.06.010 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Museum information systems: The case for computerization
Wentz, P. (1989) · International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship · doi:10.1016/0260-4779(89)90080-0 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The use of computers in museums: present situation and problems
Sher, J. A. (1978) · Museum International · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0033.1978.tb02128.x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Chenhall, R. G. (1978) · Museum International · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0033.1978.tb02129.x · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Lovis, W. A., Kintigh, K. W., Steponaitis, V. P., & Goldstein, L. G. (2004) · Legal Perspectives on Cultural Resources · doi:10.5040/9798216435969.ch-009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Reconsidering Institutional Research Policies on Indigenous Collections
Bryant, L., Taylor, M., & Elliff Cruz, L. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.11 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Archaeology, the Caddo Indian Tribe, and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
Carter, M. C. (1993) · Index of Texas Archaeology Open Access Grey Literature from the Lone Star State · doi:10.21112/.ita.1993.1.28 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Childs, 2004, Our Collective Responsibility: The Ethics and Practice of Archaeological Collections Stewardship, v
- Mihesuah, 2000, Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains?
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1993c. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Fifth Meeting: September 20–22, 1993, Washington, DC . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Yellowman, 1996, Naevahoo’Ohtseme—We Are Going back Home: The Cheyenne Repatriation of Human Remains—A Woman’s Perspective, Thomas Law Review, 9, 103
- Ambler, 2013, Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact, and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 197
- Harjo, 1989, Last Rites for Indian Dead: Treating Remains Like Artifacts Is Intolerable, Los Angeles Times
- 1993, Memorandum on Summaries, Inventories, and Notification under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1993a. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Fourth Meeting: February 26–28, 1993, Honolulu, Hawaii . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1994b. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Seventh Meeting: May 12–14, 1994, Rapid City, South Dakota . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Trope, 2000, Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains?, 124
- Goff, 2019, Using and Curating Archaeological Collections, 27
- Liebmann, 2008, Archaeology and the Postcolonial Critique, 73
- McKeown, 2012, In the Smaller Scope of Conscience: The Struggle for National Repatriation Legislation 1986–1990
- 1986, Statement Concerning the Treatment of Human Remains
- Marquardt, 2004, Our Collective Responsibility: The Ethics and Practice of Archaeological Collections Stewardship, 123
- Trope, 1992, The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Background and Legislative History, Arizona State Law Journal, 24, 35
- Harris, 1991, Respect for the Living and Respect for the Dead: Return of Indian and Other Native American Burial Remains, Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law, 39, 195
- Watkins, 2012, The Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology, 28
- Wentz, 1995, Collections Management, 198
- Marquardt, 1977, Regional Centers in Archaeology: Prospects and Problems
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1995b. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Ninth Meeting: February 16–18, 1995, Los Angeles, California . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1996b. Transcript of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Eleventh Meeting: June 9–11, 1996, Billings, Montana . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- 1996, Principles of Archaeological Ethics
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1994c. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Eighth Meeting: November 17–19, 1994, Albany, New York . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- McKeown, 2013, Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact, and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 55
- 1987, Problems Protecting and Preserving Federal Archeological Resources. RCED-88-3
- 1991, Memorandum on file at the National Park Service
- Devon, 2000, Repatriation Reader: Who Owns American Indian Remains?, 106
- Krech, 1999, Collecting Native America 1870–1960, 1
- Nason, 1996, Tribal Models for Controlling Research, Tribal College: Journal of American Indian Higher Education, 8
- Sturtevant, 1999, Collecting Native America 1870–1960, v
- Solomon, Geraldine . 1998. History of Museums and Databases: The Development and Implementation of a Museum Collection Information System. Master’s thesis, Department of Information Sciences, American University, Washington, DC.
- McManamon, 1992, Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Arizona State Law Journal, 24, 217
- Childs, 2004, Our Collective Responsibility: The Ethics and Practice of Archaeological Collections Stewardship, 3
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1993b. Progress on Implementing the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: A Report to Congress . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Jelks, 1989, Curation of Federal Archeological Collections of the Southwest Division, US Army Corps of Engineers. Manuscript on file, US Army Corps of Engineers, Southwestern Division
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1992a. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, April 29–May 1, 1992, Washington, DC . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1992c. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Third Meeting: October 8–10, 1992, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Tsosie, 1999, Privileging Claims to the Past: Ancient Human Remains and Contemporary Cultural Values, Arizona State Law Journal, 31, 583
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1996a. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection And Repatriation Review Committee, Eleventh Meeting: June 9–11, 1996, Billings, Montana . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Trimble, 2003, Ethical Issues in Archaeology, 99
- Galla, 1997, Museum Ethics, 140
- Boyd, 1992, The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act: Prospects for New Partnerships between Museums and Native American Groups, Arizona State Law Journal, 24, 253
- Carpinone, Elana . 2010. Museum Collections Management Systems: One Size Does Not Fit All. Master’s thesis, Department of Communication, Media and Arts, Seton Hall University, East Orange, New Jersey.
- Sullivan, 1992, A Museum Perspective on Repatriation: Issues and Opportunities, Arizona State Law Journal, 24, 283
- Ford, 1977, Systematic Research Collections in Anthropology: An Irreplaceable National Resource
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1992b. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Second Meeting: August 26–28, 1992, Lakewood, Colorado . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Lindsay, 1979, The Curation and Management of Archaeological Collections: A Pilot Study. Publication PB-296
- Hemenway, 2013, Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact, and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 83
- Lindsay, 1980, Cultural Resource Management Series. US Department of the Interior, Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service
- West, 2000, NAGPRA at 10: Examining a Decade of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, Museum News, 79, 42
- 1994, Code of Ethics for Museums
- 1984, Commission on Museums for a New Century
- Stickland, 1993, Back to the Future: A Proposed Model Tribal Act to Protect Native Cultural Heritage, Arkansas Law Review, 46, 161
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1995a. Report to Congress . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- Chari, 2013, Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives on the Intent, Impact, and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 7
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1995c. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Tenth Meeting: October 16–18, 1995, Anchorage, Alaska . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
- NAGPRA Review Committee. 1994a. Minutes of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Review Committee, Sixth Meeting: January 23–25, 1994, Phoenix, Arizona . Report on file at the National Park Service, Washington, DC.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pathways to Repatriation for NAGPRA Practitioners: Introduction
Yann, J., Domeischel, J., Roberts Thompson, A., & Schreiner, N. M. (2025) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2025.10107 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Building a Foundation: A Retrospective on NAGPRA Collections Compliance 1990–1995 – CORRIGENDUM
Sieg, L. E., & Neller, A. J. (2026) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2026.10151
Self-citationGuiding the Next Generation of NAGPRA Practitioners: Formalizing Undergraduate NAGPRA Education
Caseldine, C. R., Rothwell, J. E., Blaszynski, B. O., Dahlstedt, A. C., Tappan, K. K., Vega, Z., Hartman, S., Wilhelm, K. E., & Deer, M. (2026) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2026.10149
Philosophically Aligned, Operationally Fractured: Duty-Of-Care In NAGPRA Practice
Ensign, M. (2026) · ScholarWorks (Central Washington University)
- Authors
- Sieg, L., & Neller, A.
- Affiliations
- National Museum of the American Indian (US)
- Wanapum Heritage Center
- Corresponding author
- Sieg, Lauren
- Venue
- Advances in Archaeological Practice
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2025-08
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 364-384
- ISSN
- 2326-3768 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7106851193
- Semantic Scholar
- 59b7ba246f0e65e074d771d38bef5bf791a9176b
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advances in Archaeological Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Keywords
- NAGPRA, museum collections, tribal consultation, repatriation, code of ethics, archaeological ethics, museum ethics, law implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review