The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures
Abstract
In this article, the New London Group presents a theoretical overview of the connections between the changing social environment facing students and teachers and a new approach to literacy pedagogy that they call
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy
Gee, J. P. (2003) · Computers in Entertainment · doi:10.1145/950566.950595 · Cited by 5,735
Chapter 3 : Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education
Gee, J. P. (2000) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x025001099 · Cited by 2,727
Discourse: A Critical Introduction
Blommaert, J. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610295 · Cited by 2,369
“Multiliteracies”: New Literacies, New Learning
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009) · Pedagogies: An International Journal · doi:10.1080/15544800903076044 · Cited by 1,490
MOJE, E. B., CIECHANOWSKI, K. M., KRAMER, K., ELLIS, L., CARRILLO, R., & COLLAZO, T. (2004) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.39.1.4 · Cited by 1,320
Metadata
- Authors
- The New London Group
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 1996-04-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-93
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W4250445487
- Cited by
- 5,551
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 466.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
- The paper
- The New London Group. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
