The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Colonizer/Colonized Chicana Ethnographer: Identity, Marginalization, and Co-optation in the Field
Abstract
In this article, Sofia Villenas describes her experience of being caught in the midst of oppressive discourses of "othering" during her work as a Chicana ethnographer in a rural North Carolina Latino community. While Villenas was focusing on how to reform her relationship with the Latino community as "privileged" ethnographer, she missed the process by which she was being co-opted by the dominant English-speaking community to legitimate their discourse of Latino family education and child-rearing practices as "problem." By engaging in this discourse, she found herself complicit in the manipulation of her own identities and participating in her own colonization an marginalization. Through her story, Villenas recontextualizes theories about the multiplicity of identities of the researcher. She problematizes the "we" in the literature of qualitative researchers who analyze their race, class and gender privileges. Villenas challenges dominate-culture education ethnographers to move beyond the researcher-as-colonizer position and to call upon their own histories of complicity and marginalization in order to move toward new identities and discourses. Similarly, she calls upon ethnographers from marginalized cultures to recognize their position as border crossers and realize that they are their own voices of activism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why doesn't this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy
Ellsworth, E. (1989) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.59.3.058342114k266250 · Cited by 2,759
Cited by
Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research
Berger, R. (2015) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112468475 · Cited by 4,031
“It has been recognized, especially in the context of studying minority groups, that a ‘dual identity’ of a researcher and a member of the community being studied shape the research process (Brayboy, 2000; Chaudhry, 2000; Delgado Bernal, 1998; Motzafi-Haller, 1997; Villenas, 1996, 2000).”
BackgroundPower and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures
Merriam, S. B., Johnson-Bailey, J., Lee, M.-Y., Kee, Y., Ntseane, G., & Muhamad, M. (2001) · International Journal of Lifelong Education · doi:10.1080/02601370120490 · Cited by 1,134
Using a Chicana Feminist Epistemology in Educational Research
Bernal, D. D. (1998) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48 · Cited by 1,009
Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research
Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166 · Cited by 249
Re-Examining and Re-Envisioning Criticality in Language Studies: Theories and Praxis
Kubota, R., & Miller, E. R. (2017) · Critical Inquiry in Language Studies · doi:10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Villenas, S.
- Venue
- Harvard Educational Review
- Publisher
- Harvard Education Publishing Group
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 711-732
- ISSN
- 0017-8055 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-5045
- OpenAlex
- W1734301899
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.