The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches
Abstract
Starting from a critique of protest event and political discourse analysis, we propose an extended methodological approach that has the quantitative rigor of event analysis but also retrieves the qualitative discursive elements of claims. Our political claims approach extends the sample of contentious actions beyond protest event analysis by coding institutional and civil society actors, and conventional and discursive action forms, in addition to protests by movement actors, This redefines the research object to acts of political claims making in a multi-organizational field. We use examples from a research project on mobilization about migration and ethnic relations in Britain and Germany to demonstrate the analytic gains that are possible with our approach. By situating protest and social movements, not just theoretically but also methodologically, in a wider context of political claims making, we are in a better position to follow the recent calls for more integrated approaches, which place protest within multi-organizational fields, link it to political opportunities and outcomes, and are sensitive to discursive messages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712340000380x · Cited by 2,563
Dynamics of Repression and Mobilization: The German Extreme Right in The 1990s
Koopmans, R. (1997) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/maiq.2.2.e6g82877674x6048 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Cited by
Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210357 · Cited by 438
Self-citationGiugni, M., & Passy, F. (2004) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00145.x · Cited by 122
CONSTRUCTING RELATIONAL AND VERIFIABLE PROTEST EVENT DATA: FOUR CHALLENGES AND SOME SOLUTIONS*
Oliver, P., Hanna, A., & Lim, C. (2023) · Mobilization: An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/1086-671x-28-1-1 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Koopmans, R., & Statham, P.
- Venue
- Mobilization: An International Quarterly
- Publisher
- Mobilization Journal
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-221
- ISSN
- 1086-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2216327311
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756
- The paper
- Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political Claims Analysis: Integrating Protest Event and Political Discourse Approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.4.2.d7593370607l6756
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.