The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research
Abstract
Frame theory is often credited with "bringing ideas back in" social movement studies, but frames are not the only useful ideational concepts. The older, more politicized concept of ideology needs to be used in its own right and not recast as a frame. Frame theory is rooted in linguistic studies of interaction, and points to the way shared assumptions and meanings shape the interpretation of events. Ideology is rooted in politics and the study of politics, and points to coherent systems of ideas which provide theories of society coupled with value commitments and normative implications for promoting or resisting social change. Ideologies can function as frames, they can embrace frames, but there is more to ideology than framing. Frame theory offers a relatively shallow conception of the transmission of political ideas as marketing and resonating, while a recognition of the complexity and depth of ideology points to the social construction processes of thinking, reasoning, educating, and socializing. Social movements can only be understood by linking social psychological and political sociology concepts and traditions, not by trying to rename one group in the language of the other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ideas, institutions, and policy change
Béland, D. (2009) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501760902983382 · Cited by 629
Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields
Snow, D. A. (2007) · The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements · doi:10.1002/9780470999103.ch17 · Cited by 557
Megamarketing: The Creation of Markets as a Social Process
Humphreys, A. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.74.2.1 · Cited by 543
Democracy versus Distinction: A Study of Omnivorousness in Gourmet Food Writing
Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/518923 · Cited by 517
Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change: Narratives and Impact
Han, H., & Ahn, S. W. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104127 · Cited by 348
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, P., & Johnston, H.
- Venue
- Mobilization: An International Quarterly
- Publisher
- Mobilization Journal
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-54
- ISSN
- 1086-671X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109192887
- Cited by
- 562
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17813/maiq.5.1.g54k222086346251
- The paper
- Oliver, P., & Johnston, H. (2000). What a Good Idea! Ideologies and Frames in Social Movement Research. Mobilization: An International Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.5.1.g54k222086346251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.