The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Employers Use Flexible Staffing Arrangements: Evidence from an Establishment Survey
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines which employers use flexible staffing arrangements, why they use these arrangements, and their implications for workers and public policy, drawing on a nationally representative survey of private sector establishments. Use of flexible staffing arrangements-including temporary help agency, short-term, on-call, regular part-time, and contract workers-is widespread and two-thirds of employers believe this use will increase in the near future. Traditional reasons concerning the need to accommodate fluctuations in workload or absences in staff are the most commonly cited reasons for using all types of flexible staffing arrangements. Many employers also use agency temporaries and part-time workers to screen candidates for regular positions. Finally, savings on benefits costs is an important factor determining employers' use of flexible staffing arrangements. Workers in flexible staffing arrangements typically are not covered by regulations governing benefits, and they typically do not receive key benefits, like pension benefits and health insurance, when these benefits are offered to regular full-time workers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Autor, D. H. (2003) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/344122 · Cited by 1,534
Emerging Trends in Contingent Work Research
Connelly, C. E., & Gallagher, D. G. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.008 · Cited by 516
Reverse logistics and social sustainability
Sarkis, J., Helms, M. M., & Hervani, A. A. (2010) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.220 · Cited by 476
Autor, D. H. (2001) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.281431 · Cited by 397
Batt, R., & Colvin, A. J. S. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.64869448 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Houseman, S. N.
- Publisher
- W.E. Upjohn Institute
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- OpenAlex
- W2099955460
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Employers Use Flexible Staffing Arrangements: Evidence from an Establishment Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.17848/wp01-67
- The paper
- Houseman, S. N. (2000). Why Employers Use Flexible Staffing Arrangements: Evidence from an Establishment Survey. https://doi.org/10.17848/wp01-67
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.