The DOI matches its Crossref record.
OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes how marine data made available by public repositories based in Flanders benefit Belgian society and the global community.Key findings from an OECD survey of the repositories' users are discussed and several recommendations are provided for policymakers looking to build upon the provision of public marine data.Data are required for marine sciences, the operation of ocean economic activities and the effective management of marine space, much of it collected through different types of observing systems and made available for reuse through public data repositories.Flanders' public marine data repositories adhere to open data policies, are free-to-use and many do not require login credentials for data access.As a result, limited information is collected automatically from users and bespoke studies are required to understand how societal value is generated from their uses of the data.The OECD aims to provide the evidence policymakers require to assess the societal benefits of sustained marine data infrastructures by collaborating with different data communities.The current OECD project improves understanding of the economics of public marine data by surveying repository users and analysing the responses to construct conceptual value chains of their data uses.The Flanders survey follows-on from a similar survey conducted in the United Kingdom in 2020-2021.Flanders provides an interesting case study in understanding the societal value of the reuse of public marine data because a collection of national and international repositories are based there.Open data policies of the Government of Flanders have encouraged multiple Flemish organisations, including Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ) and Flemish Hydrography, to make marine data publicly available through dedicated repositories.In addition to its national repositories, Flanders is home to a relatively large number of international repositories important for global data provision.Flanders' public marine data repositories involved in the OECD survey are listed in Annex B. Responses to the OECD survey reveal how Flanders' repositories enable the reuse of marine data across a range of sectors, contribute to improved decision making, and generate benefits for wider society.The following key points can be drawn from analysis of the responses:• Flanders' repositories have a large and varied international user base.Some 74% of respondents reported working in countries other than Belgium with a total of 58 different countries represented.They work in diverse occupations: scientists, public officials, business managers and many others.They come from sectors beyond the government/policy sector which tends to fund repositories' activities.• Individual users of Flanders' repositories frequently use multiple repositories and would struggle to complete their tasks without them.They access marine data from across the spectrum of parameter disciplines such as physical oceanography and human activities and combine different data types to generate the information they require for their analyses.• Reuses of data from Flanders' repositories are plentiful, complex and have effects on a broad range of ocean economic activities from traditional industries such as fishing to emerging activities such as marine renewable energy generation.The benefits associated
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yeheyis, M., Hewage, K., Alam, M. S., Eskicioglu, C., & Sadiq, R. (2013) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6 · Cited by 640
Gaglio, C., Kraemer-Mbula, E., & Lorenz, E. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121785 · Cited by 452
Empirical evaluation of sustainability of divergent farms in the dryland farming systems of India
Haileslassie, A., Craufurd, P., Thiagarajah, R., Kumar, S., Whitbread, A., Rathor, A., Blummel, M., Ericsson, P., & Kakumanu, K. R. (2016) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.014 · Cited by 66
Patents and regulatory exclusivities on GLP-1 receptor agonists
Alhiary, R., Kesselheim, A. S., Gabriele, S., Beall, R. F., Tu, S. S., & Feldman, W. B. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.13872 · Cited by 67
CRISPR in context: towards a socially responsible debate on embryo editing
Morrison, M., & de Saille, S. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0319-5 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Venue
- OECD science, technology and industry working papers
- Published
- 2010-02-17
- ISSN
- 1815-1965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4212877156
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/18151965
- The paper
- OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. (2010). OECD science, technology and industry working papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/18151965
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.