Cited by 66Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgricultural Economics and PracticesAgricultural Innovations and Practices

Empirical evaluation of sustainability of divergent farms in the dryland farming systems of India

Open access
Haileslassie, Amare, Craufurd, Peter, Thiagarajah, Ramilan, Kumar, Shalander, Whitbread, Anthony, Rathor, Abhishek, Blummel, Michael, Ericsson, Polly +1 more·2016·Ecological Indicators

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.014

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few attempts have been made by researchers to develop composite sustainability indices (CSIs) using multiple indicators at the farm and farming system levels.

    “Few attempts have been made by researchers to develop composite sustainability indices (CSIs) using multiple indicators at the farm and farming system levels [9,16].”

    From Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Divergent Mediterranean Farming Systems: Cyprus as a Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [16]

    Section 2.2.3 describes building composite sustainability indices from multiple indicators, and Section 3.2 reports them across farm typologies. The paper thus provides an example of the approach, but the passages do not establish the claim that few researchers have attempted it. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Socioeconomic development and environmental protection are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

    “For the overall sample, the EnCSI was positively associated with the SCSI ( rs = 0.33) and the EcCSI ( rs = 0.12), indicating that socioeconomic development and environmental protection are not necessarily mutually exclusive [11,16].”
  • Off/non-farm income is a source of income diversification and an alternative livelihood strategy (especially for small-scale farmers) that may keep farming activity alive.

    “It is a source of income diversification and an alternative livelihood strategy (especially for small-scale farmers) that may keep farming activity alive [16,21,35].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haileslassie, A., Craufurd, P., Thiagarajah, R., Kumar, S., Whitbread, A., Rathor, A., Blummel, M., Ericsson, P., & Kakumanu, K. R.
Affiliations
  • International Water Management Institute (ET)
  • Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
  • International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (IN)
  • International Livestock Research Institute (KE)
Corresponding author
Haileslassie, Amare
Venue
Ecological Indicators
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
60
Pages
710-723
ISSN
1470-160X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1789432554
Cited by
66
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Indicators (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (acceptedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Massey Research Online (Massey University) (submittedVersion)
  • MELSpace (ICARDA (The International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
CGIAR
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Keywords
farm typology, sustainable agriculture, rainfed agriculture, composite sustainability index, economic sustainability, social sustainability, environmental sustainability, farm heterogeneity, off-farm livelihoods, Andhra Pradesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review