Cited by 55Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityDigital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies

The Impact of AI on the Workplace: Evidence from OECD Case Studies of AI Implementation

Open access
Anna Milanez·2023·OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers

Abstract

How artificial intelligence (AI) will impact workplaces is a central question for the future of work, with potentially significant implications for jobs, productivity, and worker well-being. Yet, knowledge gaps remain in terms of how firms, workers, and worker representatives are adapting. This study addresses these gaps through a qualitative approach. It is based on nearly 100 case studies of the impacts of AI technologies on workplaces in the manufacturing and finance sectors of eight OECD countries. The study shows that, to date, job reorganisation appears more prevalent than job displacement, with automation prompting the reorientation of jobs towards tasks in which humans have a comparative advantage. Job quality improvements associated with AI – reductions in tedium, greater worker engagement, and improved physical safety – may be its strongest endorsement from a worker perspective. The study also highlights challenges – skill requirements and reports of increased work intensity – underscoring the need for policies to ensure that AI technologies benefit everyone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/2247ce58-en

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Acemoglu, D. et al. (2022), "Artificial Intelligence and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies", Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 40/S1, pp. S293-S340, https://doi.org/10.1086/718327/SUPPL_FILE/20462DATA.ZIP. · DOI
  2. Acemoglu, D. and P. Restrepo (2019), "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor", Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 33/2, pp. 3-30, http://10.1257/jep.33.2.3. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Alekseeva, L. et al. (2021), "The demand for AI skills in the labor market", Labour Economics, Vol. 71, p. 102002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102002. · DOI
  4. Bessen, J. (2019), "Automation and jobs: when technology boosts employment*", Economic Policy, Vol. 34/100, pp. 589-626, https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa001. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bessen, J. et al. (2018), "The Business of AI Startups", https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3293275.
  6. Brynjolfsson, E. and T. Mitchell (2017), "What can machine learning do? Workforce implications", Science, doi: 10.1126/science.aap8062, pp. 1530-1534, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8062. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brynjolfsson, E., T. Mitchell and D. Rock (2018), "What Can Machines Learn, and What Does It Mean for Occupations and the Economy?", AEA Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 108, https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/pandp.20181019. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cazes, S., A. Hijzen and A. Saint-Martin (2015), "Measuring and Assessing Job Quality: The OECD Job Quality Framework", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris, Vol. 174, https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrp02kjw1mr-en. · DOI
  9. Elliot, S. (2017), "Computers and the Future of Skill Demand", Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264284395-en. · DOI
  10. Felten, E., M. Raj and R. Seamans (2019), "The Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Labor, Skills, and Polarization", undefined, https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3368605. · DOI
  11. Felten, E., M. Raj and R. Seamans (2019), "The Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence: Labor, Skills, and Polarization", SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3368605. · DOI
  12. Fortin, N., T. Lemieux and N. Lloyd (2022), "Right-to-Work Laws, Unionization, and Wage Setting", https://doi.org/10.3386/W30098. · DOI
  13. Georgieff, A. and R. Hyee (2021), "Artificial intelligence and employment: New cross-country evidence", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris, Vol. 265, https://doi.org/10.1787/c2c1d276-en. · DOI
  14. Green, A. and L. Lamby (2023), "The supply, demand and characteristics of the AI workforce across OECD countries", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 287, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/bb17314a-en. · DOI
  15. Grennan, J. and R. Michaely (2017), "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Evidence from Analysts", https://conference.nber.org/conf_papers/f130049.pdf.
  16. Hunt, W., S. Sarkar and C. Warhurst (2022), "Measuring the impact of AI on jobs at the organization level: Lessons from a survey of UK business leaders", Research Policy, Vol. 51/2, p. 104425, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104425. · DOI
  17. Kaplan, J. (2016), Humans Need Not Apply: A Guide to Wealth and Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, Yale University Press , New Haven, Connecticut.
  18. Kelly, J. (2004), "Social Partnership Agreements in Britain: Labor Cooperation and Compliance", Industrial Relations, Vol. 43, No. 1.
  19. Lane, M. and A. Saint-Martin (2021), "The impact of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market: What do we know so far?", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris, Vol. 256, https://doi.org/10.1787/7c895724-en. · DOI
  20. Manca, F. (2023), "Six questions about the demand for artificial intelligence skills in labour markets", OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 286, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/ac1bebf0-en. · DOI
  21. OECD (2021), "AI and the Future of Skills, Volume 1: Capabilities and Assessments", Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5ee71f34-en. · DOI
  22. OECD (2020), "Promoting an Age-Inclusive Workforce: Living, Learning and Earning Longer", OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/59752153-en. · DOI
  23. OECD (2019), "Artificial Intelligence in Society", OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en. · DOI · Paper page
  24. OECD (2019), "Negotiating Our Way Up: Collective Bargaining in a Changing World of Work", OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/1fd2da34-en. · DOI
  25. OECD (2019), "OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work", OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en. · DOI
  26. OECD (2018), "OECD Employment Outlook 2018", https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2018- en. · DOI
  27. OECD (2017), "OECD Employment Outlook 2017", OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-en. · DOI
  28. Raj, M. and R. Seamans (2019), "Primer on artificial intelligence and robotics", https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-019-0050-0. · DOI
  29. Samek, L., M. Squicciarini and E. Cammeraat (2021), "The human capital behind AI: Jobs and skills demand from online job postings", OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 120, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/2e278150-en. · DOI
  30. Samek, L., M. Squicciarini and E. Cammeraat (n.d.), The human capital behind AI : Jobs and skills demand from online job postings | OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers | OECD iLibrary, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/the-human- capital-behind-ai_2e278150-en.
  31. Tyson, L. and J. Zysman (2022), "Automation, AI & Work", Daedalus, Vol. 151/2, pp. 256-271, https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_A_01914. · DOI · Paper page
  32. UNESCO/OECD/IDB (2022), "The Effects of AI on the Working Lives of Women", UNESCO, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/14e9b92c-en. · DOI
  33. Wajcman, J. (2015), Pressed for Time: The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
  34. Webb, M. (2019), "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Labor Market", SSRN Electronic Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3482150. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milanez, A.
Corresponding author
Anna Milanez
Venue
OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
Published
2023-03-27
ISSN
1815-199X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360962889
Cited by
55
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OECD social employment and migration working papers (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation
  • Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales
  • Employment and Social Development Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Keywords
artificial intelligence, workplace impact, future of work, job displacement, automation, job quality, employee well-being, employee engagement, physical safety, skill requirements, work intensity, manufacturing industry, finance sector, employee representatives, AI policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review