Cited by 487Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems

Artificial Intelligence in Society

OECD·2019·OECD eBooks

Abstract

Moving forward, the OECD is gearing up to move from principles to action.We are determined to help countries implement the Recommendation to ensure that our societies and economies harness the full promise of AI, sharing its benefits broadly and putting the right safeguards in place so that no one is left behind -now and for generations to come.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/eedfee77-en

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI has many benefits and raises anxieties and concerns about adverse impacts on human autonomy, privacy, and fundamental rights and freedoms.

    “AI has many benefits (e.g., improvements in creativity, services, safety, lifestyles, helping solve problems) and yet at the same time, raises many anxieties and concerns (adverse impacts on human autonomy, privacy, and fundamental rights and freedoms) ( OECD 2019 ).”
  • International coverage of legal and human rights issues is evident in policy documents of the United Nations, OECD, Council of Europe, CEPEJ, and the European Data Protection Supervisor.

    “International coverage of legal and human rights issues is evident in policy documents of United Nations ( 2019 ); OECD (2019) ; Council of Europe”
  • ML algorithms are autonomous only in the sense that they can run continuously and have the potential to translate their outputs automatically into regulatory actions.

    “Thus, it can be claimed that ML algorithms are autonomous 'only in the sense that they can run continuously and have the potential to translate their outputs automatically into regulatory actions'.105”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as [105]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
OECD eBooks
Published
2019-06-11
OpenAlex
W4232929704
Cited by
487
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 38 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
53.59
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
OECD eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Keywords
artificial intelligence, AI policy implementation, AI governance, safeguards, inclusive AI, benefits of artificial intelligence, responsible AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review