CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Legal and Labor StudiesLabor Movements and UnionsLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Shaping the transition: Artificial intelligence and social dialogue

Open access
Clara Krämer, Sandrine Cazes·2022·OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
DOI 10.1787/f097c48a-en
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Rapid advances in the development and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies provide new opportunities but also raise fears about disruptive labour market and workplace transitions. This working paper examines how social dialogue can shape the AI transition in beneficial ways for both workers and firms. It highlights that social dialogue can generally help foster inclusive labour markets and ease technological transitions, and presents new descriptive evidence together with ongoing initiatives from social partners showing that social dialogue has an important role to play in the AI transition as well. The paper also discusses how AI adoption may affect social dialogue itself, e.g. by adding new pressures on weakening labour relations systems and posing practical challenges to social partners, such as insufficient AI-related expertise and resources to respond to the AI transition. Based on these insights, the paper suggests a few measures for policy makers who would like to support social partners’ efforts in shaping the AI transition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/f097c48a-en

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Providing citizens with the opportunity to share hands-on AI knowledge and to voice expectations with respect to the introduction of different kinds of AI products and services is an unavoidable step, and it has been recognized as such by international stakeholders.

    “Providing citizens with the opportunity to share hands-on AI knowledge and to voice the expectations with respect to the introduction of different kinds of AI products and services is an unavoidable step, and it has been recognized as such by international stakeholders, even if this dialogue has mainly been understood from the perspective of preventing a worsening of the working conditions in”

    From Deepfakes, Democracy, and the Ethics of Synthetic Media: A Synthesis of the SOLARIS Project (2026) · cites this paper as Krämer & Cazes, 2022

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Krämer, C., & Cazes, S.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
Publisher
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)
Published
2022-10-03
ISSN
1815-199X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1787/f097c48a-en
OpenAlex
W4298152152
Cited by
7
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
OECD social employment and migration working papers (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation
  • Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Labor Movements and Unions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
artificial intelligence, social dialogue, social partners, labour market transitions, technological change, inclusive labour market, labor relations, artificial intelligence adoption, policy interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review