Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 486

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 199 of the 199 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How’s Life in Latin America?: Measuring Well-being for Policy Making

OECD·2021·OECD eBooks

Abstract

Measuring well-being means looking at multidimensional development outcomes at the national and regional level from the perspective of people (individuals and households) rather than indicators of economic growth alone.This requires taking into account a broader range of metrics than have traditionally been used to monitor national progress, describing people's current material conditions and quality of life, the distribution of outcomes across population groups and locations, and the systemic resources that are needed to underpin the sustainability of people's well-being into the future.This report, How's Life in Latin America?Measuring well-being for policy making, is the result of a threeyear project led by the OECD Centre on Well-being, Inclusion, Sustainability and Equal Opportunity and the OECD Development Centre.This project has aimed to identify comparable metrics for monitoring multidimensional well-being across Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), to highlight areas for improvement in data collection and coverage, and to explore the policy use of well-being frameworks in LAC countries.The report is based on an adapted version of the OECD Well-being Framework, reflecting the priorities of the LAC region, particularly in the context of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).It has been produced in the framework of the European Union's Regional Facility for Development in Transition for Latin America and the Caribbean, which results from joint work led by the EU, the OECD, and the UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).Taking a more comprehensive and people-focused approach to measuring development is particularly relevant in the LAC region, where inequalities and other structural challenges persist despite many countries achieving high-or upper middle-income status in recent decades, highlighting the importance of the Development in Transition approach.The upheaval that the region has experienced since the project began in 2018 -with the wave of social protests that emerged in late 2019, and swiftly followed by the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 -further underlines the need for a broader view of progress that puts people's well-being at the centre of policy making and international cooperation in order to "build forward better".

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/2965f4fe-en

Cites

199 of 199 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 199 references

Metadata

Authors
OECD
Venue
OECD eBooks
Published
2021-10-28
OpenAlex
W4243007198
Cited by
486
References
199
FWCI
176.90
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How’s Life in Latin America?: Measuring Well-being for Policy Making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/2965f4fe-en
The paper
OECD. (2021). How’s Life in Latin America?: Measuring Well-being for Policy Making. OECD eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1787/2965f4fe-en

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.