Cited by 4,578COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker)

Open access
Hale, Thomas, Angrist, Noam, Goldszmidt, Rafael, Kira, Beatriz, Petherick, Anna, Phillips, Toby, Webster, Samuel, Cameron-Blake, Emily +3 more·2021·Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract

COVID-19 has prompted unprecedented government action around the world. We introduce the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT), a dataset that addresses the need for continuously updated, readily usable and comparable information on policy measures. From 1 January 2020, the data capture government policies related to closure and containment, health and economic policy for more than 180 countries, plus several countries’ subnational jurisdictions. Policy responses are recorded on ordinal or continuous scales for 19 policy areas, capturing variation in degree of response. We present two motivating applications of the data, highlighting patterns in the timing of policy adoption and subsequent policy easing and reimposition, and illustrating how the data can be combined with behavioural and epidemiological indicators. This database enables researchers and policymakers to explore the empirical effects of policy responses on the spread of COVID-19 cases and deaths, as well as on economic and social welfare. The Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT) records data on 19 different government COVID-19 policy indicators for over 190 countries. Covering closure and containment, health and economics measures, it creates an evidence base for effective responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Singapore gradually ramped up measures after confirming its first COVID-19 case on January 23, while long avoiding more disruptive interventions including school closures.

    “measures were gradually ramped up after the country confirmed its first case on January 23, while the more disruptive interventions, including school closures, were long avoided (Hale et al. 2021).”
  • As noted by Hale et al. (2021), while the initial policy response was relatively uniform, later measures were driven by local epidemiological situations and differing political environments, leading to divergent policy responses.

    “As noted by Hale et al. (2021), while the initial policy response was relatively uniform, later measures were driven by local epidemiological situations and differing political environments, leading to divergent policy responses.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Hale et al. (2021)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Majumdar, S., & Tatlow, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas (BR)
Corresponding author
Hale, Thomas
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2021-03-08
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
529-538
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135257712
Cited by
4,578
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 340 · 2025: 570 · 2024: 762 · 2023: 1065 · 2022: 1126 · 2021: 626 · 2020: 81 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
346.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Blavatnik Family Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, government response, pandemic policy, Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, policy indicators, containment measures, health policy, economic policy, policy easing, policy timing, subnational jurisdictions
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Communicable Disease Control, Financial Support, Government, Health Policy, Humans, Masks, Public Policy, Schools, Social Welfare, Transportation, Travel, Databases, Factual, Contact Tracing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review