Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 755

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health for Everyone?: Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems

OECD·2019·OECD Health Policy Studies

Abstract

Health is one of the main components of a good life.In addition to having value in itself, good health also translates into a better chance of succeeding in education and in the labour market -ultimately contributing to enhance opportunities for people to improve their standing in life.At the same time, inequalities in income and educational attainment contribute to health inequality.Ensuring that everyone, regardless of socio-economic circumstances, has access to the health system can help make sure that economic prosperity is shared by the entire population.This publication analyses inequalities in health and health systems and thus provides a key insight for the discussion of how societies can become more inclusive.It looks into socio-economic differences in the exposure to risk factors to health, health status, the utilisation of health services, unmet health care needs and coverage.To assess these inequalities, the report undertakes detailed analyses of micro-level data from a range of national health surveys representing 33 OECD and EU countries, presenting differences between the most and least well-off as well as population-level summary measures of inequalities. Poor health behaviour tends to be more prevalent among the disadvantaged, but the relationship between risk factors and educational level can be complexOverall, less educated people are more likely to be overweight and smoke.This applies to both sexes but the extent of these inequalities differs.In all countries, there is a greater risk of women with low education to be obese or overweight.For men, this holds true in about 55% of countries.Regarding tobacco consumption, the less educated men are significantly more likely to smoke in all countries and in 80% of countries in the case of women.The picture for hazardous alcohol consumption is less clear.For women, there are no significant differences in drinking habits across education levels in around two-thirds of the countries but in 25% of them, alcohol consumption rises with income.Men with a high education level are less likely to be heavy drinkers but the population-level gradient is only significant in around half of the countries. No matter how it is measured, the least educated are more likely to be in bad healthAcross all countries, people in the lowest education category are twice more likely to view their health as poor compared to those with tertiary education (44% vs. 23%).Similar results can be observed for other variables of health status, such as limitations in daily activities and prevalence of multiple chronic conditions. 15 HEALTH FOR EVERYONE?© OECD 2019 Why a report on health-related inequalities? Introduction and method Health is essential to well-being and increases a person's chance of being productive…Health is one of the main components of a good life, and it is of intrinsic value.Data collected in the context of the OECD's Better Life Index 1 from around 145 000 citizens around the world suggest that health is the number one priority for living a good life for the majority of people.Being in good health also contributes to other important outcomes such as labour market outcomes, educational achievement and allows for an active participation in community life.Particularly important in an economic context is the impact on labour market outcomes: good health translates into a better chance of finding a job, being more productive and ultimately creates opportunities for people to improve their standing in life (Chapter 2 of this report will discuss this further).The Preventing Ageing Unequally report (OECD, 2017[1]), showed that, at all ages, men and women in bad health work less and earn less when they work.Over the course of a career, bad health reduces lifetime earnings by 33% and 17% for men with low and high levels of education, respectively (and with smaller effects overall for women).This is detrimental to economies and societies at large. Annex 1.A. Summary tablesAnnex Table 1.A.1.Key results, country-by-country

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/3c8385d0-en

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 755

Metadata

Authors
OECD
Venue
OECD Health Policy Studies
Published
2019-09-27
ISSN
  • 2074-3181 (ISSN-L)
  • 2074-319X
OpenAlex
W4247722653
Cited by
755
References
75
FWCI
136.96
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health for Everyone?: Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/3c8385d0-en
The paper
OECD. (2019). Health for Everyone?: Social Inequalities in Health and Health Systems. OECD Health Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1787/3c8385d0-en

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.