The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives
Abstract
Open Government Data (OGD) initiatives, and in particular the development of OGD portals, have proliferated since the mid-2000s both at central and local government levels in OECD and non OECD countries. Understanding the preconditions that enable the efficient and effective implementation of these initiatives is essential for achieving their overall objectives. This is especially true in terms of the role played by OGD in relation to Open Government policies in general. This paper highlights the main principles, concepts and criteria framing open government data initiatives and the issues challenging their implementation. It underlines the opportunities that OGD and data analytics may offer policy makers, while providing a note of caution on the challenges this agenda poses for the public sector. Finally, the overall analysis of key concepts and issues aims to pave the way for an empirical analysis of OGD initiatives. So far, little has been done to analyse and prove the impact and accrued value of these initiatives. The paper suggests a methodology comprising an analytical framework for OGD initiatives (to be applied to ex post and ex ante analysis of initiatives) and a related set of data to be collected across OECD countries. The application of the analytical framework and the collection of data would enable the acquisition of a solid body of evidence that could ultimately lead to mapping initiatives across OECD countries (i.e. a typography of initiatives) and developing a common set of metrics to consistently assess impact and value creation within and across countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Keulen, D. S. (2014) · Cited by 1,677
The New Ambiguity of 'Open Government'
Yu, H., & Robinson, D. G. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2012489 · Cited by 396
Creating Open Government Ecosystems: A Research and Development Agenda
Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A., & Cook, M. (2012) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi4040900 · Cited by 300
A classification scheme for open government data: towards linking decentralised data
Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2011) · International Journal of Web Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1504/ijwet.2011.040725 · Cited by 166
Government data and the invisible hand
Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W. P., & Felten, E. W. (2008) · bepress Legal Repository · Cited by 120
Seri, P., Bianchi, A., & Matteucci, N. (2014) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2014.03.004 · Cited by 42
Cited by
On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities
Allam, Z., & Dhunny, Z. A. (2019) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.032 · Cited by 1,178
Smart governance in the context of smart cities: A literature review
Pereira, G. V., Parycek, P., Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-170067 · Cited by 466
Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance
Barns, S. (2018) · City, Culture and Society · doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.006 · Cited by 312
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015
OECD (2015) · OECD Digital Economy Outlook · doi:10.1787/9789264232440-en · Cited by 272
Digital Government Index: 2019 results
(2020) · OECD Public Governance Policy Papers · doi:10.1787/4de9f5bb-en · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Venue
- OECD Working Papers on Public Governance
- Published
- 2013-05-27
- ISSN
- 1993-4351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158792003
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en
- The paper
- Open Government Data: Towards Empirical Analysis of Open Government Data Initiatives. (2013). OECD Working Papers on Public Governance. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k46bj4f03s7-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.