The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovation and Inclusive Development: A Discussion of the Main Policy Issues
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Piloted in 2006, M-Pesa had over 2 million subscribers in its first year of operation, and now boasts just under 20 million M-Pesa accounts (Foster and Heeks 2013;Onsongo 2013;Paunov 2013: 50;Safaricom 2016).”
From Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa (2018) · cites this paper as Paunov 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Americans Do IT Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle
Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Reenen, J. V. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.1.167 · Cited by 1,028
Mobile Money: Communication, Consumption and Change in the Payments Space
Maurer, B. (2012) · Journal of Development Studies · doi:10.1080/00220388.2011.621944 · Cited by 338
Cited by
Cannibalizing the Informal Economy: Frugal Innovation and Economic Inclusion in Africa
Meagher, K. (2018) · The European Journal of Development Research · doi:10.1057/s41287-017-0113-4 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Venue
- OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers
- Published
- 2013-01-29
- ISSN
- 1815-1965
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovation and Inclusive Development: A Discussion of the Main Policy Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/5k4dd1rvsnjj-en
- The paper
- Innovation and Inclusive Development: A Discussion of the Main Policy Issues. (2013). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4dd1rvsnjj-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
