Cited by 80Agricultural Innovations and PracticesClimate change impacts on agricultureClimate Change Policy and Economics

Overcoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture

Anita Wreford, Ada Ignaciuk, Guillaume Gruère·2017·OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers

Abstract

Considerable efforts have been devoted to understanding and developing technologies and practices that can help the agricultural sector reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. The uptake of these "climate-friendly" technologies and practices, however, remains low. This report, based on a comprehensive review of the literature, analyses barriers that may prevent farmers from adopting climate-friendly practices. A multitude of potential barriers exist, some associated with farm-level constraints, others operating at the sector level, or created by existing policies. A series of recommendations are made to properly identify these types of barriers and to select the right instruments that would work to implement effective policy solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/97767de8-en

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditions and practices are a moderate/high barrier for farmers/foresters.

    “Traditions, practices Human Farmer/forester Moderate/high Communication and engagement”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Diverse lobby groups are a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.

    “Diverse lobby groups Institutional Government High Dialog with lobbyists transparent to public”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Lack of adequate spatial planning is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for government and farmer/forester.

    “Lack of adequate spatial planning Institutional Government; farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Appropriate regulations and engagement with stakeholders”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Lack of infrastructure is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for farmers/foresters.

    “Lack of infrastructure Technological/economic Farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Investment support”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

  • Lack of access to input and output markets is a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters and government.

    “Lack of access to input and output markets Economic Farmer/forester; government Moderate Financial incentives, transportation infrastructure, labeling”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Restoring Degraded Lands

    Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works

    “In principle, two strategies apply (141): the revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and the introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove the key barriers.”
    Background

Authors
Wreford, A., Ignaciuk, A., & Gruère, G.
Affiliations
  • Scion (NZ)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
  • Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
Venue
OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers
Published
2017-04-27
ISSN
1815-6797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2610430916
Cited by
80
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2015: 1
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • OECD food, agriculture and fisheries working papers (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
technology adoption, barriers to adoption, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, climate change adaptation, farmers, agricultural policy instruments, climate policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review