Overcoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture
Abstract
Considerable efforts have been devoted to understanding and developing technologies and practices that can help the agricultural sector reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. The uptake of these "climate-friendly" technologies and practices, however, remains low. This report, based on a comprehensive review of the literature, analyses barriers that may prevent farmers from adopting climate-friendly practices. A multitude of potential barriers exist, some associated with farm-level constraints, others operating at the sector level, or created by existing policies. A series of recommendations are made to properly identify these types of barriers and to select the right instruments that would work to implement effective policy solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditions and practices are a moderate/high barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Traditions, practices Human Farmer/forester Moderate/high Communication and engagement”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Diverse lobby groups are a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Diverse lobby groups Institutional Government High Dialog with lobbyists transparent to public”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Lack of adequate spatial planning is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for government and farmer/forester.
“Lack of adequate spatial planning Institutional Government; farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Appropriate regulations and engagement with stakeholders”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Lack of infrastructure is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Lack of infrastructure Technological/economic Farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Investment support”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Lack of access to input and output markets is a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters and government.
“Lack of access to input and output markets Economic Farmer/forester; government Moderate Financial incentives, transportation infrastructure, labeling”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Hidden and transaction costs are a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Hidden and transaction costs Economic/institutional Farmer/forester Moderate Simplification of regulations”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Reliance on imports and trade agreements is a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Reliance on imports, trade agreements Institutional Government High Include environmental standards in trade agreements”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Uncertain land tenure is a moderate/locally contextual barrier for government and farmer/forester.
“Uncertain land tenure Institutional Government; farmer/forester Moderate/locally contextual Appropriate regulations and engagement with stakeholders”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Lack of political incentives is a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Lack of political incentives Institutional Government High Targeted political measures, redirection of subsidies”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Costs of adoption/lack of access to credit are a moderate barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Costs of adoption/lack of access to credit Economic Farmer/forester Moderate Investment support”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Actual or perceived effects on performance of restoration/sustainable land management practices are a high-importance barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Actual or perceived effects on performance of restoration/sustainable land management practices Human/social Farmer/forester High Communication and education; rural advisory services”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Perverse subsidies are a high-importance barrier for governments preventing adoption of restoration/sustainable land management practices.
“Perverse subsidies Institutional Government High Redirect to act on environmental concerns”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Actual or perceived lack of financial benefit is a high-importance barrier for farmers/foresters.
“Actual or perceived lack of financial benefit Economic Farmer/forester High Communication and education, financial incentives”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Barriers specific to restoration may include a perceived lack of financial benefit, insufficient information or education, prohibitive costs of adoption, lack of access to credit, systems of uncertain land tenure, and lack of infrastructure or appropriate spatial planning.
“Barriers specific to restoration may include a perceived lack of financial benefit, insufficient information or education, prohibitive costs of adoption, lack of access to credit, systems of uncertain land tenure, and lack of infrastructure or appropriate spatial planning (141) (Table 2).”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Two strategies apply to address barriers: revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove key barriers.
“In principle, two strategies apply (141): the revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and the introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove the key barriers.”
From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [141]
Cites
Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2943 · Cited by 1,616 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Arneth, A., Olsson, L., Cowie, A., Erb, K.-H., Hurlbert, M., Kurz, W. A., Mirzabaev, A., & Rounsevell, M. D. A. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012320-054809 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“In principle, two strategies apply (141): the revision of policies that impede restoration objectives and the introduction of targeted initiatives that could directly help remove the key barriers.”
Background
- Authors
- Wreford, A., Ignaciuk, A., & Gruère, G.
- Affiliations
- Scion (NZ)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
- Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques (FR)
- Venue
- OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers
- Published
- 2017-04-27
- ISSN
- 1815-6797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2610430916
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2015: 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- OECD food, agriculture and fisheries working papers (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- technology adoption, barriers to adoption, greenhouse gas emissions reduction, climate change adaptation, farmers, agricultural policy instruments, climate policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review